what if your cloud=provider gets hacked ?

Submitted ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨kristoff@infosec.pub⁩ to ⁨selfhosted@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hosting-firm-says-it-lost-all-customer-data-after-ransomware-attack/

Hi all,

As self-hosting is not just “home-hosting” I guess this post should also be on-topic here.

Beginning of the year, bleeping-computers published an interesting post on the biggest cybersecurity stories of 2023.

Item 13 is an interesing one. (see URL of this post). Summary in short A Danish cloud-provider gets hit by a ransomware attack, encrypting not only the clients data, but also the backups.

For a user, this means that a senario where, not only your VM becomes unusable (virtual disk-storage is encrypted), but also the daily backups you made to the cloud-provider S3-storage is useless, might be not as far-fetches then what your think.

So … conclussion ??? If you have VMs at a cloud-provider and do daily backups, it might be usefull to actually get your storage for these backups from a different provider then the one where your house your VMs.

Anybody any ideas or remarks on this?

(*) bleepingcomputer.com/…/the-biggest-cybersecurity-…

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

NAK@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The real issue here is backups vs disaster recovery here.

Backups can live on the same network. Backups are there for the day to day things that can go wrong. A server disk is corrupted, a user accidentally deletes a file, those kinds of things.

Disaster recovery is what happens when your primary platform is unavailable.

Your cloud provider getting taken down is a disaster recovery situation. The entire thing is unavailable. At this point you’re accepting data loss and starting to spin up in your disaster recovery location.

The fact they were hit by crypto is irrelevant. It could have been an earthquake, flooding, terrorist attack, or anything, but your primary data center was destroyed.

Backups are not meant for that scenario. What you’re looking for is disaster recovery.

source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Yes. Fair point.
  
  On the other hand, most of the disaster senarios you mention are solved by geographic redundancy: set up your backup // DRS storage in a datacenter far away from the primary service. A scenario where all services,in all datacenters managed by a could-provider are impacted is probably new.
  
  It is something that, considering the current geopolical situation we are now it, -and that I assume will only become worse- that we should better keep in the back of our mind.
  
  source
  - GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    It should be obvious from the context here, but you don’t just need geographic separation, you need “everything” separation. If you have all your data in the cloud, and you want disaster recovery capability, then you need at least two independent cloud providers.
    
    source
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

So … conclussion ???

Have backups.

Only 2 copies of your data stored in the same place isn’t enough, you want 3 at minimum and at least 1 should be somewhere else.

source
- Treczoks@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Indeed. Whatever you put in a cloud needs backups. Not only at the cloud provider, but also “at home”.
  
  There has been a case of a cloud provider shutting down a few months ago. The provider informed their customers, but only the accounting departments that were responsible for the payments. And several of those companies’ accounting departments did not really understand the message except for “needs no longer be paid”.
  
  So for the rest of the company, the service went down hard after a grace period, when the provider deleted all customer files, including the backups…
  
  source
- SchizoDenji@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  What if the data is leaked/compromised?
  
  source
  - pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    That’s why you use encryption.
    
    source
  - MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Backups are usually encrypted from most popular backup programs, either by default or as an option (restic, borg, duplicati, veeam, etc…). So that would take care of someone else getting their hands on your backup data.
    
    For local data on my devices, my laptop is encrypted with bitlocker, and my Android phone is by default. My desktop at home is not though.
    
    source
SteefLem@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Its just some elses computer. Said this since the beginning

source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The issue is not cloud vs self-hosted. The question is “who has technical control over all the servers involved”. If you would home-host a server and have a backup of that a network of your friend, if your username / password pops up on a infostealer-website, you will be equaly in problem!
  
  source
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
haha

"the cloud" does not change the fact that if you data does not reside in 2 physical locations you do not have a backup.

so yes, standard practices that have existed... well, since the beginning, still apply.

source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Well, the issue here is that your backup may be physically in a different location (which you can ask to host your S3 backup storage in a different datacenter then the VMs), if the servers themselfs on which the service (VMs or S3) is hosted is managed by the same technical entity, then a ransomware attack on that company can affect both services.
  
  So, get S3 storage for your backups from a completely different company?
  
  I just wonder to what degree this will impact the bandwidth-usage of your VM if -say- you do a complete backup of your every day to a host that will be comsidered as “of-premises”
  
  source
  - originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    yeah, you can use another cloud provider as backup.. if you do it correctly.
    
    personally, my disaster recovery plans dont include entire offsite VMs. i only care about data in a dr situation. so you send incremental daily backups offsite.
    
    containers have made VMs even more irrelevant/ephemeral so focus on the data.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - ErwinLottemann@feddit.de ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    if you backup your vm data to the same provider as you run your vm on you don’t have an ‘off-site’-backup, which is one criteria of the 3-2-1 backup rule.
    
    source
Samsy@lemmy.ml ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Easy, I always mirror my cloud. My setting is: cloud is extern and in my network there is always the same copy of everything on a simple smb-nas.

My house burns to the ground (or easier, the NAS is broken) = online backup

The online provider got hacked? No problem, I have an backup at home.

The hackers burned my house down at the same time they killed my cloud… Well fuck.
source
TCB13@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I’m more worried about what’s going to happen to all the self-hosters out there whenever Cloudflare changes their policy on DNS or their beloved free tunnels. People trust those companies too much. I also did at some point, until I got burned by DynDNS.

source
- Dave@lemmy.nz ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  We start paying for static IPs. If cloudflare shuts down overnight, a lot of stuff stops working but no data is lost so we can get it back up with some work.
  
  source
  - TCB13@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    They’re just creating a situation where people forget how to do thing without a magic tunnel or whatever. We’ve seen this with other things, and a proof of this is the fact that you’re suggesting you’ll require a static IP while in fact you won’t.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
LastoftheDinosaurs@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
[deleted]
source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  What was that saying again?
  
  “the biggest thread to the safety and cybersecurity of the citizens of a country … are managers who think that cybersecurity is just a number of an exellsheet”
  
  (I don’t know where I read this, but I think it really hits the nail on the head)
  
  source
  - limonfiesta@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Security expenditures are just numbers on an Excel sheet, just like HR, and legal…it’s a business.
    
    You know what else is a big threat? Executives of cost-center departments not understanding how to articulate their needs in terms of profit, or profit loss. HR and legal departments are generally much better at explaining their concerns and needs in terms of profit, and not abstract concepts like security.
    
    source
Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters

DNS Domain Name Service/System

IP Internet Protocol

NAS Network-Attached Storage

[Thread #410 for this sub, first seen 8th Jan 2024, 07:45] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

source
pineapplelover@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I am my cloud provider. Don’t have duplicate copies of my server yet so I guess I’m kinda fucked.

source
- dai@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  But man, I’ll be able to amend all those TODO items that have been accumulating of the last 12 months and fix all those issues while rebuilding my raid.
  
  I mean that’s only if my GITs aren’t hijacked during the ransomware attack.
  
  And I mean, I’ll probably just push the same config to my server and let it on its merry way again.
  
  source
Septimaeus@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Dammit, I came here hoping to see at least one “I have a very special set of skills.” Oh well.

Yeah I’d cut bait, rebuild from latest tapes.

But I’d dump the corrupted backups into an eye-catching container, like a child’s backpack or something, to put on the wall in my office.

So for the duration of the investigation, at least I have a fun story to tell.

source
MNByChoice@midwest.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I wonder if the specifics of the hack would make backing up elsewhere fail. Possibly by spreading the hack to new machines.

In any case, testing backups is important.

source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I have been thinking the same thing.
  
  I have been looking into a way to copy files from our servers to our S3 backup-storage, without having the access-keys stored on the server. (as I think we can assume that will be one of the first thing the ransomware toolkits will be looking for).
  
  Perhaps a script on a remote machine that initiate a ssh to the server and does a “s3cmd cp” with the keys entered from stdin ? Sofar, I have not found how to do this.
  
  Does anybody know if this is possible?
  
  source
Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
A data cloud backup loss should be fine, because it’s a backup. Just re-up your local backup to a new cloud/second physical location, that’s the whole point of two.

I don’t see a need to run two conccurent cloud backups.

source
- kristoff@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  In this case, it is not you -as a customer- that gets hacked, but it was the cloud-company itself. The randomware-gang encrypted the disks on server level, which impacted all the customers on every server of the cloud-provider.
  
  source
  - Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Yeah absolutely, but tonyou as an individual , it’s the same net effect of your cloud backup is lost. Just re-up your local backup to a different cloud provider.
    
    source

Fewer Letters	More Letters
DNS	Domain Name Service/System
IP	Internet Protocol
NAS	Network-Attached Storage