A lot of people don’t realize that this has been implemented and been used for a long time. In Romania, during communism, most major cities had infrastructure for using heat produced in factories and thermal (usually coal) power plants.
There are 2 ways in which it was implemented. One was to heat water into steam and to transport the steam using insulated pipes to local facilities that heat water. This can be more efficient, but the disadvantage is that working on pressurized steam pipes is really dangerous for the workers. There have been numerous accidents in the news about those.
Alternatively, you can simply transport hot water through insulated pipes to local facilities, these can heat the water additionally if the water isn’t hot enough, and then it’s distributed to homes.
The main issue in Romania is that these systems haven’t been properly maintained in at least 30 years, a lot of heat gets lost and they tend to fail a lot, people get frustrated and disconnect from the network, the neighbors get a worse service because not enough hot water is consumed for the water in the pipes to not go cold and they disconnect too, and the system just gets worse and worse. Some cities have enacted a policy not allowing people to disconnect.
JakenVeina@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Seems more like such waste heat should be recovered and fed back into the system, to reduce energy consumption for the facility as a whole. If there’s enough waste heat to meaningfully talk about transferring it to homes via water or steam, surely there’s enough to make some electricity.
I sure don’t want Amazon or Microsoft involved in the utilities businesses, as another commenter pointed out.
UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Heat isnt a great generator of electrical power. At least not at lower temperatures ( below boiling, for steam generation). It also suffers from conversion loss. Anytime you convert energy, there is a loss. Using the heat directly avoids another conversion.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 year ago
The data centres are trying to get rid of the heat!
Are you proposing converting the heat to electricity? That would require a huge amount of heat pumps (to concentrate the heat) and a turbine hall (the smaller, the less efficient). You’d be talking about 20% efficiency at most, probably more like 10% for the total system efficient.
Compare that to a good district heating system which is typically 90% efficient.