Holy crap, that’s a lot of work to get a roll of filament. That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing. Ugh.
"That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing." Well, we should all be able to live lives where we can pursue things that do not have monetary rewards. Obviously not everyone is in that position but perhaps for David Florian exploring and learning and trying things is what makes him happy. Of course for him it probably makes money as well, even if indirectly. The face his video got shared means more people will see it, and more views means more money, so there's the value for David Florian. It's also worth considering that in science, it's all about trying things and gathering information that will hopefully lead to new (and hopefully lower cost) capabilities.
sj_zero 1 year ago
tbf, you wouldn't do this because it's cheaper, you'd do it because it's more ecologically friendly and it helps make your 3d printer a bit more sustainable.
But at 20 bucks for a spool of thread, you won't be coming out ahead economically by recycling, I agree.
dawnerd@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It’d be fun to mess around with if it wasn’t 12-18k for the setup.
sj_zero 1 year ago
Yikes. That's a loooooootta filament.
thantik@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s also not more ecologically friendly – you’ve gotta use near 80% virgin material with 20% regrind for a good quality product. All you’re doing is bringing its production into your house on a smaller, more inefficient scale.
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The video uses 50/50, not 80/20
sj_zero 1 year ago
ngl, I've never tried it and I doubt I'm about to start, so prints go into the recycle bin so they can get dumped in the landfill with the rest of the recycling.
But at the very least, it's a better practice to use PLA as your main choice.
Aux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, the ecologically friendly option is to send it to the recycling.
sj_zero 1 year ago
Assuming it's recycled instead of sent to a landfill.
Once you find out about how the business of recycling works that's often not such a certain assumption.
Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re naive if you think that “recycling” hasn’t been a complete smokescreen for decades, FFS.