Reddit’s replacement mods may be putting its communities at risk — With institutional knowledge seeping out of the site, poor moderation could have real-world impacts as more misinformation is allo…::Reddit’s moderator purge could have real impacts on reliability and information safety as it rushes to replace mods with inexperienced and poorly vetted volunteers, shows a new report.
Die reddit die
jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 1 year ago
I don’t know, every time I read a headline with the word “could” in it I’m not interested, because there are no facts in it it’s just speculation.
the list goes on and on.
vikinghoarder@infosec.pub 1 year ago
That could be a good point
PrinzMegahertz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That could be a smart comment
ominouslemon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Then read the article and not just the headline. There are various examples of why that’s happening.
Your examples are just funny, but when (good) journalists write “could”, it means that they have analyzed something and they are predicting its outcome based on the data they have collected. It’s not like they’re just making stuff up
_number8_@lemmy.world 1 year ago
fuck reddit; isn’t this just what voting is for? i don’t want mods at all, ideally, i want to see what other people posted without anyone getting authority to say ‘achshully’
Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well, that’s the same as saying “I don’t believe in Science because it’s just theories”.
Argumenting-by-dictionary, about the words selected for the title - i.e. the form of only the title - says nothing at all about the quality or lack thereof of the actual content of the article itself.
Or to put things another way, you put forward a theory (the article is just speculation) and then tried to support it by argumenting about appearences (the presence or not of a very specific word) on something barelly related to the actual article much less its contents (the title).
Not only is that incredibly reductionist, it’s not even logical.