if the problem is that major platforms are centralized, opaque, and controlled by corporations, why would the solution be yet another centralized platform controlled by a corporation?
Because people are brainwashed into only trusting billionaires, corporations, brand names, and consumer packaged goods to solve all our problems.
stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
🤢
doriandiaconuro@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Funny timeline we live in
daychilde@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The alternative is Facebook with lies that go unchecked completely. This is actually an area where AI is not bad.
FreddyNO@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The system that is notorious for lying being used for fact checking. Yea maybe you should write “bad” in caps lock one more time, that will make you right.
stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours ago
“Correcting” incorrect information with more incorrect information doesn’t improve the situation.
AI tools are inherently unreliable because of the randomness of their text generation.
And worse, Europe doesn’t build its own AIs. LLM fact checking would have to be done by Grok or Claude or some other product from big American tech. And there’s an obvious problem with a social media network trying to avoid American censorship and political bias but “fact checking” with a tool that has American censorship and political bias built into it.
LwL@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I doubt it, honestly. It’d likely catch a lot of misinfo, yes, but it would likely also classify any new findings that run counter to previous assumptions as misinfo. LLMs can’t keep up to date. And they still have the same issue that whoever trains them gets to decide what is and isn’t misinfo, which starts being a problem when it’s an ubiquitous social media site.
LuceVendemiaire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
just because it is a solution doesn’t mean its a good solution or even better than no solution
Specter@feddit.org 1 day ago
I mean, there’s always Lemmy.