Def better, but you know, that’s still people, so eww.
Induced Demand
Submitted 2 days ago by NarrativeBear@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a50c1be6-33fd-4c4c-9a18-3805f829e3e1.jpeg
Comments
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 day ago
agreed. hitting cars with a car can end your fun prematurely.
hitting pedestrians with a car can make your fun last at least an hour.
dumbass@piefed.social 2 days ago
I’m in a weird position, I hate how car centric the world is and designed to be car first, but I also equally hate walking any distance that requires effort. So imma sit this one out.
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
behold: busses and trains
rockerface@lemmy.cafe 2 days ago
Having well maintained public transport within 3 minutes of walking sounds way better than driving to me
Emi@ani.social 2 days ago
Now just to make it so it doesn’t cost 25czk for single trip.
Bratosch@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well, the car centricism isn’t gonna go away without effort. But the ‘walking effort’ you hate is going to become more tolerable and maybe even enjoyable the more you do it. So, I guess one ‘hate’ is endless while the other is not?
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Pedestrianized infrastructure tends to be denser since they don’t need parking lots. It often requires more effort to get in your car and drive and park than just walking 100 feet in a place without cars.
China has rideshare bike parking basically on every street, and it costs like 2USD/mo so you can almost always just get on a random bike and use it to go even just 100 feet to get to the subway or bus entrance.
feannag@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
The problem with bike share is the helmet issue. I love my bike but I’m not going to carry a helmet everywhere I go on the off chance I might bike.