You said “two of the three reviewers found substantive deficiencies in rationale, design, validation of results, interpretation, and presentation.”
So… what is left?
Submitted 1 month ago by pseudo@jlai.lu to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://jlai.lu/pictrs/image/4b35b60e-f594-42c9-bf19-9eb119c11a73.jpeg
You said “two of the three reviewers found substantive deficiencies in rationale, design, validation of results, interpretation, and presentation.”
So… what is left?
Formatting?
Commas are important
Maybe M. Pupique aimed for a pun.
A predatory journal?
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Did the peer reviewer call in sick and emergency sub a NYT book reviewer?