You said “two of the three reviewers found substantive deficiencies in rationale, design, validation of results, interpretation, and presentation.”
So… what is left?
Submitted 3 days ago by pseudo@jlai.lu to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://jlai.lu/pictrs/image/4b35b60e-f594-42c9-bf19-9eb119c11a73.jpeg
You said “two of the three reviewers found substantive deficiencies in rationale, design, validation of results, interpretation, and presentation.”
So… what is left?
Formatting?
Commas are important
Maybe M. Pupique aimed for a pun.
A predatory journal?
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
Did the peer reviewer call in sick and emergency sub a NYT book reviewer?