For many of these, WebAssembly is critical to either their entire product or a major feature.
But I think this alone is not very convincing. We don’t yet see major websites entirely built with webassembly-based frameworks.
Why should it be necessary to build things only in wasm for the web? JS is a really good language for building frontends. There is a reason why lots of companies prefer building native applications with React. People always complain about framework bloat with JS, but then we want to hype up shipping huge wasm binaries? Just for basic interaction in a UI?
Wasm is doing great, inside and outside the browser. But it won’t replace JS because there’s no reason to do so.
user28282912@piefed.social 1 hour ago
It seems to just be more attack surface for very little actual gain on JS. At least with JS I have NoScript, Ublock and some actual say over what loads/runs on my box. For this reason, I usually just disable all wasm/webgl/webrtc until I find out that I actually need it which for me is basically never or only for very short periods.