996: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., 6 days a week
Sure, they’re burnt out, sluggish, surly, but… they’re present. And when they’re present, they’re not out in the world spending their income. They don’t need an expensive apartment or house, all they do there is sleep. Why have a fancy car when all you do is drive to/from your shitty job in it? Family? Who would have children with somebody who works such a schedule?
Even if you got more productivity from the same workers on a 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., 4 days a week schedule, you’d have to pay them more, not just per hour but overall, because they’d be out spending money on those afternoons / evenings and 3 days a week they have off. Organizing, demanding better healthcare, dental, more paid time off for vacations, and higher total wages to support all these “needs” they invent for themselves on their time off.
Keep 'em locked down, keep 'em tasked with … anything, doesn’t matter if it’s productive or not, as long as it keeps them on-the-job and not spending their pay.
psx_crab@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
No, it’s about keeping worker locked down and denied them the time to rest or find another job. I work 51 hours a week and most people in my line of work tend to stay in line because they’re too tired physically and mentally to look for another job.
As we like to joke, all the money we earn we give it to doctor.