Pick a side Javascript

Comments

• stevehobbes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Jennifer is a lesbian. Her now husband, who she’s proudly supportive of, is FtM, with 3 previous children that Jennifer adopted. Jennifer has never had penetrative sex with a man.

  source

  • iAmTheTot@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Found the senior dev

    source
  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    … checks out.

    source
  • unreachable@lemmy.my.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    interpreter programming language

    source
  • SpicyKetchup@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This would make her not a lesbian after her husband transitioned.

    source

    • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Depends. Could be. A person transitioning doesn’t necessitate their partner finding their new body attractive.

      source
• SingularEye@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  artificial insemination; beard marriage, loves her husband platonically. I am a JS dev.

  source

  • Kraivo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Lesbian, in marriage with another lesbian and 3 adopted kids. Still virgin.

    source

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Her partner is actually a woman, but dynamic type casts made her write “husband”.

      source
    • unreachable@lemmy.my.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      and by kids, she means their cats and/or dogs

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I was thinking they were his kids from the previous marriage, though artificial insemination works just as well!

    source
  • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Java devs are prima mental gymnasticists, always able to make anything make sense.

    source

    • Konlanx@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      JS !== Java

      Try Javascript some day!

      We have truthy and falsy! Empty string or null? Yeah, that’s false! Of course we can parse a string to number, but if it’s not a number it’s NaN! null >= 0 is true! Assign a variable with =, test type equality with == and test actual equality with ===. You will NEVER use the wrong amount of = anywhere, trust me! Our default sort converts everything to string, then sorts by UTF-16 code. So yes, [1, 10, 3] is sorted and you are going to live with it. True + true = 2. You know I’m right.

      Try Javascript today!

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As a js dev, I will gymnastically take that as a compliment

      source
  • scottywh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’ve had a JavaScript certification for over a decade now and I think I hate you.

    source
• Blamemeta@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Simple. Malformed data from.a bad actor. Always sanity check your shit.

  source
• Coreidan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  If you have that much difficulty with JavaScript then it’s likely you’ll suffer with any language.

  source

  • MakeAvoy@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Except strict equality, that’s a JavaScript only problem. Imagine thinking “0” should be falsy in comparison due to string literal evaluation, but truthy with logical not applied based on non-empty string. Thus !“0”==“0” is true. They couldn’t just throw away == and start over nooooo let’s add === . Utter madness

    source

    • soloner@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Browser compatibility. Design flaws can’t easily be fixed like how other languages can just switch to a new major version and introduce breaking changes. ES must keep backwards compatibility so has had to do more additive changes than replacing behavior altogether so that older web pages pages don’t break.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • JonEFive@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Strict vs loose equality has gotten me so many times, but I can sort of see why they did it. The problem you mention with integers 0 & 1 is a major annoyance though. Like it is fairly common to check whether a variable is populated by using if (variable) {} - if the variable happens to be an integer, and that integer happens to be 0, loose quality will reflect that as false.

      But on the other side, there have been plenty of occasions where I’m expecting a boolean to come from somewhere and instead the data is passed as a text string. “true” == true but “true” !== true

      source
• asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Any senior developer who says that should instantly get a demotion to intern.

  source

  • Moc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    There are two kinds of simple

    • Simple to learn to use
    • Simple to understand

    JavaScript is the first, but definitely not the second.

    source
  • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Which part? Saying that it's simple, or making fun of saying that it's simple?

    source

    • ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      We can do both. This is clearly not a laughing matter. 🤨😤🚬🔨🐖

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Followed by a public beating.

    source

    • Kerrigor@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Forced to develop on Windows

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• bappity@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  NaN

  source

  • Ddhuud@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    !NaN

    source
• royal_starfish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And I thought kotlin was crazy with whatever (modifier: Modifier = Modifier) means to make it happy

  source
• terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Hol’ up

  source