Americium: How a small element could power the next century of space exploration

Comments

• treadful@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  In the UK, large stocks of civil nuclear waste contain significant quantities of americium-241. That makes the fuel not only long-lasting but also readily accessible. Instead of building new reactors to produce plutonium, agencies can extract Americium from existing waste, a form of recycling at a planetary scale.

  Using it seems way more preferable to just letting it sit in casks.

  Traditional RTGs utilize thermoelectrics, which are reliable but inefficient, often achieving only five percent efficiency. Stirling engines can convert heat to electricity with an efficiency of 25 percent or more. […] Stirling engines introduce moving parts, which also raises reliability concerns in space. However, Americium’s steady heat output enables RTG designs with multiple Stirling converters operating in tandem. If one fails, the others compensate, preserving power output.

  That seems a little ridiculous though. All that friction requires a lube that’ll last “generations.” In space, without gravity, and at incredibly low temperatures.

  source

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yeah, but there are many good options. Magnetic alignment can keep things from touching most of the time, maintaining very good movement without friction. Graphite is a great lubricant and works even in very cold environments, not to mention it will not be all that cold given the heat passing through the system. Redundancy is also a big part of the design, making failures much less impactful. And using sterling engines for the highest draw part of the lifetime of a probe with peltier style generators there for later would allow a failover to a solid state system at lower efficiency.

    source

    • KingOfSuede@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Sterling Engines are usually piston driven, no? I’ll admit, I’m not up to snuff on alternative designs of the Sterling engine.

      Magnetically aligned or not, you still have to seal the piston to the chamber to stop blow-by. Friction and lubrication would still come into play, wouldn’t it?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • kalkulat@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Good point on the lubricants, but given the potential profits, it’s already being worked on. www.nyelubricants.com/space

    source
  • aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Well, not at low temperatures, stirling engines still need heat.

    source

    • whaleross@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      My understanding of space engineering is that getting rid of heat is a bigger problem. Makes me wonder how much of efficiency of Stirling engines are lost due to extra weight and complexity for heat exchangers and radiators.

      source
  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You think thermoelectric generators are going to struggle with low temperatures?

    If there’s one thing we can practically guarantee, it’s the heat output lol

    I’m not an engineer in this space, so i’ll leave it to more knowledgeable people to poke holes in my argument.

    source

    • treadful@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Not thermoelectrics, but sterling engines. But fair point about the heat.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It also costs about 10 times as much as gold.

  source

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    10 times as much as gold

    To -make-, yep. As the article pointed out, there’s a lot of Amercium in waste dumps where old smoke detectors … and anyone can make it. Five times the half-life means it can power much longer missions.

    source

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I like to recover old smoke detectors and eat the americium. I’m well on my way to becoming captain americium.

      source
    • diablexical@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      longer missions

      The length of missions is not currently and will not in the short or medium term be limited by the lifespan of plutonium.

      source
    • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Seems kinda dangerous to do radioactive materials scrapping, but if you got the safety protocols and equipment worked out then it’s a living

      source
• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  isn’t this the same element found in older smoke detectors?

  source

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yes.

    Shout-out for The Radioactive Boy Scout. (RIP)

    source
  • kalkulat@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That it is!

    source
  • Badabinski@kbin.earth ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yep, and it's still used in some new ones.

    source
• mercano@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  With an atomic number of 241, it’s hardly small.

  source

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yes. And also:

    Its half-life is a staggering 432 years, five times longer than plutonium-238.

    Cringe…

    AI slop?

    source

    • settxy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Cringe…

      AI slop?

      Plutonium-238’s half-life is 87.7 years, Americium-241 is 432.6 years. Which… is almost 5 times longer, so… not sure why that’s cringe?

      With an atomic number of 241, it’s hardly small.

      I believe they’re referring to the fact that it’s not an element of major topic. This is the first time I’ve ever heard of it.

      I think this could be compelling given that tech continues to get more power efficient. I don’t know the numbers, but if we were to launch the same tech that’s on Voyager 1/2 today, would we be able to do that with 1/5 the power? If so, those probes could likely still have all their instruments running if they used Americium.

      source