Meta chief technology officer(CTO) explains why the smart glasses demo failed at Meta Connect — and it wasn’t the Wi-Fi

Comments

• just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Don’t fucking care. It’s a stupid product for a stupid company.

  Spend your effort actually helping the world and the people that inhabit, you disgusting human.

  source

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It’s a company with no morals, but the product isn’t stupid, and neither is the way the company operates or the people who run it.

    Don’t under estimate your adversary.

    source

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Yeah.

      They’re about the last company in the world I would want to use this with.

      Also, you should take these off when you pee.

      source
  • individual@toast.ooo ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    more evil than stupid IMHO, but otherwise agree

    source

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      How are smart glasses evil?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  That sounds like complete damage control lies. Why would the AI think the chef had finished prepping the sauce just because there was heavy usage??

  source

  • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yeah it’s a bunch of shit. I’m not an expert obviously, just talking out of my ass, but:

    1. Running inference for all the devices in the building to “our dev server” would not have maintained a usable level of response time for any of them, unless he meant to say “the dev cluster” or something and his home wifi glitched right at that moment and made it sound different
    2. LLMs don’t degrade by giving wrong answers, they degrade by stopping producing tokens
    3. Meta already has shown itself to be okay with lying
    4. GUYS JUST USE FUCKING CANNED ANSWERS WITH THE RIGHT SOUNDING VOICE, THIS ISN’T ROCKET SCIENCE, THAT’S HOW YOU DO DEMOS WHEN YOUR SHIT’S NOT DONE YET

    source

    • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      LLMs can degrade by giving “wrong” answers, but not because of network congestion ofc.

      That paper is fucking hilarious, but the tl;dr is that when asked to manage a vending machine business for an extended period of time, they eventually go completely insane. Some have an existential crisis, some call the whole thing a conspiracy and call the FBI, etc. it’s amazing how trash they are.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Even if it was true, your server can’t handle a couple hundred simultaneous requests? That’s not promising either. Although at least that would be easier to fix than the real problem, which is incredibly obvious to anyone who has ever used this technology, and that’s that it doesn’t fucking work, and is flawed on a fundamental level.

    source

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      If this was a tech demo, it tracks that they wouldn’t be using overpowered hardware. Why lug around a full server when they can just load up the software on a laptop, considering they weren’t expecting hundreds of invokes at the exact same moment.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      How is it fundamentally flawed?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• rozodru@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  So essentially…it’s no where near production ready.

  Also he just admitted “we’re amateurs”. IF they have devices in the crowd already then they should have sandboxed the demo. What’s more concerning is how, essentially, a handful of devices in attendance potentially operating at the same time can crash the LLM.

  Also isn’t this something that other companies like amazon and google have rectified? i.e. one individual can’t suddenly trigger every device in close proximity. If not then it makes the whole thing useless if used in the public. I could walk up and down the street just yelling “Hey Meta purchase a massive purple dildo and message my mother to go kill herself”

  source

  • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Betting it wasn’t a mere “handful”. I was thinking they handed everyone in attendance with a pair.

    source
• JigglySackles@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  No one believed it was the wifi. And I think similarly few would believe a DDoS…

  source
• ludicolo@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  This smells like bullshit. The AI was giving responses. If it was truly DDoS or wifi it wouldn’t have been able to answer the query at all. What happened here was the AI wasn’t giving responses as rehearsed before, it skipped ahead steps it.

  Even if true, kinda a rudamentary mistake for a multi billion dollar company to make. How did you not think people would show up with your product to record you unveiling the new product.

  But the audience for this product will eat up this explanation.

  source

  • billwashere@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I am not the core audience for this product as I loathe Meta with a passion but I’m also an IT professional with primary focus on hardware and system architecture/networking with 30 years experience. This explanation sounds painfully accurate and very plausible and just short sighted enough to pass my smell test. That doesn’t mean it’s accurate but I totally believe it.

    Those glasses should have been sandboxed to hell and back if not totally scripted/faked for demo purposes. Wouldn’t be the slightest bit surprised if somebody gets fired because of it.

    In my opinion it just makes the whole thing more real. I’m excited about the tech, just not from Meta. I’d become a full blown Luddite before I wear anything with a Meta name on it.

    source

    • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Sysadmin for the last decade, 100% agreed. In fact, the explanation kinda had me laughing. “Yep, I can see that exact scenario!”

      source
• pulsewidth@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  So, what I’m taking from this is that you can get people with Meta glasses arrested by just walking around with a smart-speaker broadcasting verbal request like, “Hey Meta AI, search for naked images of young girls”, or, “Hey Meta AI, show me instructions for how to bomb my government office”?

  Because to me that sounds like a huge security failure if the glasses will react and action arbitrary commands from literally any voice they hear, rather than “haha hey so, funny anecdote - this is why our demo failed”.

  source

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Or even worse: “Hey meta, play baby shark on spotify”.

    source

    • billwashere@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      We found the TRUE terrorist….

      source
  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It’s not a finished product. It was just a demo.

    That being said… tvs can set off smart speakers, so I dunno.

    source
• Wispy2891@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Shouldn’t the voice control specifically target the user voice just to prevent other people interfacing with your device? Otherwise ads can say “hey meta order a crate of coke” or someone on the street might shout “hey meta send a WhatsApp to all my contacts that proves I’m an idiot”

  source

  • billwashere@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yes.

    Ok funny story… had a friend that was an early adopter of the Amazon Echo. Went to our usual get together for board-gaming and he was showing it off. The look on his face when I said “Alexa, order a 55 gallon drum of KY jelly” and she proceeded to place the order (this was, at the time, a thing that was actually available on Amazon). He had to rush to his computer to cancel the order.

    Funny as hell…

    source
  • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Okay, telling everyone in your contacts list you bought a pair of meta AI glasses

    source
  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Voice from TV interacting with voice assistant was always a problem. They never target specific voice.

    source

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Google Assistant does.

      source
• vane@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Did he just said that they can remotely control everyone’s glasses ?

  source

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    No. He said that when the audio command came over the speakers it triggered the smart glasses of everyone in the auditorium.

    source

    • vane@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      He said literally “in the building” but I see you hear different words.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      So I just need to carry a loudspeaker with me to mess with people wearing these dumb things.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • onslaught545@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Did you assume they couldn’t?

    source

    • vane@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I hope many people buy it so I can activate porn on their glasses when they walk around in public places.

      source
• FailBetter@crust.piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Just diggin a bigger hole lol

  source
• cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It was obvious to me it wasn’t the Wi-Fi and that made me cringe.

  source
• dan69@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Omg this is just ridiculous cover up… like set up a clan for your demos… shut up…be more logical than omg we activated everyone’s and pointed them to our dev servers which can handle the load…

  source

  • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It’s not his fault. He used meta ai to engineer the network, and it had wifi issues.

    source
• zecg@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Yeah, ha ha, fuck off

  source