Regular issue

Comments

• iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Duh that is old tech, nowadays you enlarge the DNA to human size so you can easily pluck out individual nucleotides with regular tweezers.

  source
• enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  the generated clankslops out of those stock photos will be hillariousy worse.

  source
• Midnitte@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I’m sure they also spend a lot of time staring face to face with a DNA strand too

  source
• ryedaft@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Doctors: I’m helping

  You’re creating strand breaks is what you’re doing.

  source
• MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  get gud.

  source
• homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  You got through a doctoral program in evolutionary biology without knowing how to spell tweezers?

  . . .

  Okay.

  source
• Rusty@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Does CRISPR count as tweasers?

  source
• Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  You’re telling me these en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_tweezers

  don’t look like traditional tweezers except really small?

  source
• KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I think she means “as an evolutionary biologist: you have no idea …”. Rather than “as an evolutionary biologist, you have no idea …”.

  source