archived (Wayback Machine)
This sounds great but can the 70 year old grid handle the electrical load? Are they adding incentives for free or reduced solar? Is it practical AT ALL?
In California, plans to move low-income neighborhoods off of gas advance
Submitted 17 hours ago by wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net to energy@slrpnk.net
Comments
Retreaux@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Not even to add that if your power doesn’t come from renewable sources, it’s worse for the environment to switch to electric appliances. Just. This sounds like people really meaning well…
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
Actually no because it can be electrified in the future. Just push California to build up more renewables.
Retreaux@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Classic “road to hell being paved with good intentions” vibes.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 11 hours ago
California has the 2nd highest electric rates in the country. Not sure why they want to fuck poor people even more. I’m for getting things clean, but this is treating a symptom and not the disease.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 hours ago
How is this fucking poor people? They’re providing them free infrastructure upgrades. What a bizarre take.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 9 hours ago
Don’t know if you’re in California and poor, or not. I am. Gas is way cheaper. Don’t misunderstand me, I think things have to move in this direction, but unless it comes with a big subsidy (something along the lines of the heat pumps mentioned in the article), make no mistake, it’s fucking poor people.
Retreaux@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
California is great at putting it’s horse before its cart
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 14 hours ago
Same in Victoria Australia
Gas hot water systems to be phased out of Victorian homes under new energy reforms
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-24/…/105451354
We had so much gas and it was so amazing and cheap and now we’re running out of it
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
Don’t let Trump hear of this.