That’s not a typo. Windows 96 promised to build on the success of Windows 95, yet it never materialized as originally intended.
I only learned about this a few months ago. To me, this was an incredibly fascinating discovery and wanted to write about & share it.
LWD@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
This is a very good article, but this part peeved me on a petty level (as well as explaining why there’s precious little in the way of screenshots):
The opportunity to do a little investigative journalism is right there, and the blog author didn’t take it
macstainless@discuss.tchncs.de 15 hours ago
Hi, author here 👋. Thanks for the feedback. If the Internet Archive had it on their own VM to run, I would’ve tried playing with it and taken some screenshots. However, I simply did not have the time to get it running locally on my machine, especially because I’m all Mac and Virtual Box doesn’t run on M-series hardware.
I agree it’s a missed opportunity, but I chose to go a little bit of an easier route.
Thanks for reading and enjoying the other 99% of the article. 😉
hietsu@sopuli.xyz 14 hours ago
UTM is the way to go on modern Macs, and even iOS/iPadOS too! Built on QEMU and super easy to spin up virtual machines with any architecture.
mac.getutm.app
LWD@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
Based on your descriptions of the integration between Windows 96 and Office, I did get the feeling you might run into even more issues if more software wasn’t installed alongside Windows as well.
I had no idea!
And hopefully my comment didn’t come across as a dig against your article - it just promises to be a potentially fascinating follow-up. Especially when, even today, Windows Explorer feels like it added previews of files as little more than an afterthought (and occasionally as a PowerToy).
Decipher0771@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
UTM is your friend in lieu of Virtualbox