Dystopia.
OpenAI sees human interaction as a competitor to ChatGPT's super assistant ambitions
Submitted 3 weeks ago by Pro@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Dojan@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
TheBat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m going to be cringe and reference 1984.
The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always – do not forget this, Winston – always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – for ever.’
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Sigh, at some point we are gonna have to tell these AI fucks to take a hike.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
It has many valuable use cases. Replacing human interaction is not one of them.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Right, and we are trying to use it for everything but the useful stuff
Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 3 weeks ago
No-one can ever make any use cases though. I can write my own emails really easily
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I see there’s another big push to distance us from AI as some kind of boogie man.
Why do we keep falling for the shit
jqubed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I read an article a while back highlighting how many “tech bro” products seem to be about eliminating human interaction, like grocery or meal deliveries, or self-checkout in stores. There is a convenience factor for these things at times, of course, but with the way many of these executives seem to be pushing exclusively using their services and having zero direct interactions with other humans it starts to raise questions about perhaps their own interpersonal skills and why they want to eliminate the human interaction. This feels like more of the same.
brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
I mean, that sounds obvious to me after that one : www.404media.co/mark-zuckerberg-ai-chatbot-friend…
Nevermind having to talk to human people to buy food, the zuck thinks your friends should be AI too.
antisocialite@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
He also thought his Metaverse was going to be a thing.
Thorry84@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
For me personally, the self checkout is just a way better solution to the problem. It’s for me much faster and more efficient. It’s also easier for the store itself. The best kind of self checkout for me is where you can scan everything with a hand scanner or app whilst shopping. Then just pay at the self checkout and walk out. That way I just put the stuff in my bag directly, instead of from the shelf into the basket or cart. Then from the cart to the checkout and then from the checkout into my bag. It also spreads out the action of scanning the products, which means avoiding a slow and repetitive task scanning it all in 1 go. I’m also not blocking a checkout whilst scanning. I hate it when stores that offer the hand scanner have people scanning a whole cart full of stuff at the checkout. And then bagging it of course, which blocks a checkout for ages. Just go to the regular checkout if you want to do that, the cashier is faster than you are and you can focus on bagging exclusively.
However the lack of human contact is an issue. I’ve seen a lot of stores that offer self checkout recently make one or two lines available for chatting. It’s just the regular oldskool cashier, but they are relaxed about it and chat with the customer. This means people in a hurry or that don’t need contact right then can go fast through the self checkout. And people who like to chat can use the chatty checkout with a good old human being.
This for me is the best way to apply new tech, all of the benefits for all parties involved and hopefully none of the downsides.
semperverus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Most stores dont let you take the hand scanner, and it would consume that kiosk the entire time you’re shopping.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
1000001593