Big doubt
Media discovers a unique Russian culture of impunity
Submitted 4 days ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb415e42-d9ab-43bc-b6ea-524e87d3de4e.png
Comments
PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Enkrod@feddit.org 3 days ago
Washington has been committing daytime civilian murder in Iraq on a regular enough basis. Why would that change anything? And under Trump of all things, the most vile sack of shit ever to scam people into voting for him?
No, Ukraine will get no help from there, we’re going to have to step up in Europe and increase our support.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Russia’s been trying to de-escalate, but the last time there was progress in negotiations, Ukraine sent in suicide drones to attack civilian areas in Russia. Now we have expected retaliation.
It’s bs propaganda to pretend this came out of nowhere.
whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 days ago
easy block for mass murder sympathizers
If Russia wanted to deescalate they would withdraw troops from Ukraine territory and make reparations for starting the war in the first place.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 days ago
You should read Jeffrey Sachs’ breakdown of the conflict. You’re understanding of the facts is inaccurate.
LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Oh look, another Z troll to block.
el_muerte@lemm.ee 3 days ago
Russia has not “tried to de-escalate.” They could easily do so by getting the fuck out of Ukraine.
Fuck off, obvious Russian troll.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I recall seeing an article about Ukraine killing two Russians in Moscow. Not sure if you are referring to that.
The response should still not be to bomb random Ukrainian civilians. Bombing civilians only serves to make people more angry and escalate civilian targets on both sides.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 days ago
inews.co.uk/…/explosions-across-moscow-as-ukraine…
I agree. Targeting civilians by either side is unacceptable.
protist@mander.xyz 4 days ago
The Guardian’s always been pretty on point. As far as awful media sources go, I don’t know why you’d select one that’s relatively decent
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 days ago
TheGuardian is a stalwart defender of . They went as far as claiming they verified video evidence of rape on october 7
Image
Israel has this year admitted that no photo or video evidence of rape on october 7 exists.
TheGuardian is horribly unreliable and their double standards are palpable. For more info here is a great source dismantling their propaganda
protist@mander.xyz 3 days ago
I totally get having beef with a specific article, but the Guardian is more than one article my dude.
The language being used to describe Palestinians is genocidal
The Guardian view on Gazan genocide charges: Israel finds itself with a plausible case to answer
Israel’s leaders committed genocide in Gaza and must pay for it. Their political and media allies must too
lemon@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Yeah, odd choice. The Guardian is one of the few remaining outlets with actual credible integrity
Laser@feddit.org 4 days ago
I never got the sentiment either. in fact I always found it to be among the best outlets. I’m a subscriber and I don’t even live in an English speaking country, and this is my only news subscription - didn’t find one that’s better overall yet.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I am so disappointed that TheGuardian threw away their entire reputation to manufacture consent for genocide and nobody even remembers it.
Now I understand how they keep doing it after 9/11. Nobody even remembers the mass propagande campaigns when they happened.