There is no “lemmy”. It’s a collection of communities. If it’s ’leftist’ or any other ‘ist’, that’s evidence of the people here, not the platform’s sportsball choice.
Is there a non leftist version of this website?
Submitted 2 days ago by mez@lemmy.world to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
Comments
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 days ago
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
LOL my man just got ratiod for a bunch of misogyny and wants to go cry in a safe space.
Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
Oh shit, it is that guy. A drama in three acts.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 days ago
you were the incel making misogynistic posts earlier, right? do you define people as leftists when they acknowledge that women are their own human beings that have been oppressed by men for millennia? if so, you’d fit right in over at truth social, where even women hate other women (they even hate your mom for existing!)
whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 2 days ago
No. In fact, there may likely not be any discussion forum at all that doesn’t match your special, private, incorrect definition of “leftist.”
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 days ago
leftism is when women have rights, according to OP
Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 days ago
Yeah. It’s called Reddit. Filled with Nazis. You’d love it.
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Is this a new thing that’s going to happen? People with bad takes are going to complain then threaten to go make their own lemmy with hookers and blackjack but way less cool?
rational_lib@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yes, lemmy.world
adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
To add to this, whatever “website” the OP is on has no ideology. Different instances of Lemmy do moderate in different manners, so depending on the “website”/instance he visits, the content available and moderation may skew towards a specific ideology. For example, I don’t go to the news community on lemmy.ml anymore, because I got tired of the pro-Russia stance there.
So if the OP ran their own instance where race hate and misogyny were acceptable, that would fit their definition. But good luck getting anyone to federate with them.
The problem is that their definition of “left” lines up pretty well with people who are willing to cooperate with others that are different from themselves — which is the basis for any non-autocratic community.
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Why is everybody assuming OP’s definition of ‘leftist’ and inserting whatever it is they most want to attack? OP needs to be more precise about what they mean. Or they might be rage baiting.
Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Buddy, you got your whole ass out over here!
This “whatever they want to attack” has been very clearly one item: misogyny, and if you took the time to read these “attacks,” you’d pretty quickly learn that they’re based on something that just happened. In fact, if you look at OP’s comment history, you’ll find a ton of removed comments with very negative votes, and looking a bit deeper than that, you’ll find even more misogynistic posts that are still up.
You’re trolling, right? You’ve gotta be. I’m having a hard time figuring out how you could ever have come into this thread, read multiple different comments calling OP out for recent misogyny, and think this reply held any value.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 days ago
No assumptions here, in a now removed thread they literally told me that women being oppressed was “natural selection”, no joke. Look at their mod log if you want to double check, it’s rough. They definitely could be rage baiting, but the fact that they posted this after getting absolutely dumped on definitely looks like they’re looking for a safe space.
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Ok, I admit I didn’t look at their mod/post history. You’re right, that’s provides the missing context.
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You might find Truth Social to be a safe space.