Impressive. Very nice. Now let’s see the random read/write speed.
Micron just demoed the world's fastest SSD with PCIe 6.x tech, a sequential read speed of 27GB/s, and yes, it's just a prototype for now
Submitted 3 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
imnapr@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
The next monster hunter is gonna require this in the specs
Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
It will still be sold at a fraction of what Apple charges for their far inferior SSDs.
Apoplexy@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sequential read/write is very rarely interesting, cool to see it’s possible though. Random read/write and IOPS are much more important for daily use, preferably numbers without cache. Better cell endurance is always a bonus too, though I have yet to have a SSD die on me, probably just luck at this point.
Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
It’s late and with all the other politics in my feed, I read that as Macron at first, and spent longer than I want to admit seriously imagining him on stage demoing this to show a new French foray into tech or something
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 day ago
If I ever get my hands on one, I will once again have a write speed faster than my download speed. It’ll be like the 90’s again! :D
apostrofail@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
like the ’90s* again!
jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Okay cool, but post the random IOPs please.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
It wasn’t that long ago when RAM had similar transfer speeds.
With PCIe 6, consumer grade SSDs shouldn’t need more than a single lane. That will be nice since AMD and Intel have been pretty skimpy with the PCIe lanes lately.
Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
the problem at least in the shortrun, is that if you got that many ssds running in single lane on a consumer platform at the likely inflated cost the drives would be, it would almost be cheaper just to get the workstation platform at that point.
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 days ago
What about latency though?
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
The latency of RAM has been around 10ns for the last couple decades. The latency of a good NVMe SSD is about 1000 times worse than RAM.
chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
I have never once been about to tell a real world difference in SSD speeds. Until OS I/O code improves, faster SSDs don’t excite me.
KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
There was a jump between old early gen SATA SSDs and modern NVMe in my opinion, but it’s really only noticable if you’re running something like a game with a huge amount of data to load, and you’re actively comparing the two.
My old PC had several different hard drives of differing types and I’d periodically be too lazy to move a game from one drive to another so I’d play it off different drives over a period of time, and was able to compare the loading times.
So I’d say they’re faster, but it’s nowhere near the leap that HDD to SSD was.
chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
I agree. HDD to SSD was a huge leap. NVME was a small, sometimes noticable upgrade. Past that, I can’t tell a difference. And it’s hard to get excited about the hardware updates when the software can’t use it.
Godort@lemm.ee 2 days ago
When do we start needing active coolers for our drives?
kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
i have a samsung 2.5" ssd and it actually would benefit from active cooling. when i installed my os, downloaded my steam games, and then made a copy of one (because steam insists on updating which breaks mods) and noticed that write speed was slow af…so i tested with kdiskmark and all speeds were exactly at 75mb/s while they should be at like 550. it throttled to keep temperature under 60c.
randombullet@programming.dev 2 days ago
Enterprise NVMe drives have some active cooling, but it’s mostly due to high density
wabafee@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I wonder if we reach to the point we’re RAM would be unnecessary.
wasabi@feddit.org 2 days ago
27GB/s is faster than DDR4 RAM.
hark@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Just wait until they come out with DDR4 SAM.
Peffse@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I just want bigger drives… I feel like we’ve been stuck at 1TB for at least a decade.
Godort@lemm.ee 2 days ago
You can get spinning rust all the way up to 32 TB in a single 3.5" disk and 8 TB in an NVMe drive. The tech is out there, but it takes time for the price of stuff like that to come down when there isnt much demand for it.
Peffse@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I refuse to believe there isn’t much demand for it when we have MicroSD cards approaching 2TB.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
There’s lots of demand for large drives, it’s mostly for enterprise drives though.
ramble81@lemm.ee 2 days ago
There are 32 and 64TB enterprise SSDs out there now too.
GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 2 days ago
SSDs have gotten much cheaper. 10 years ago, they were over $0.50/GB, now they’re just over $0.04/GB That’s over 12 times cheaper.
You can get a 2tb ssd for $85. 10 years ago a 2tb ssd would’ve been super expensive and very boogie.
hark@lemmy.world 2 days ago
SSDs were even cheaper until memory manufacturers decided it was getting too cheap: tomshardware.com/…/ssd-prices-predicted-to-skyroc…
They predicted prices would go higher and, through the magic of intentionally constricting supply, it happened. Prices still have not dropped back down to where they were in 2023.
qaz@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Where can you get a 2TB SSD for $85? Most 2TB SSD’s I’ve seen cost about €120 with the cheapest going down to €98.
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yeah, my 2013 black 1TB cost like 100€ so 12 years ago, prices are going down but not really falling off a cliff lol.
commander@lemmings.world 2 days ago
What are you talking about?
My laptop SSD is 2tb and I got it 3 years ago.
Peffse@lemmy.world 2 days ago
One step above what I had back in 2012? What exactly does that say about progress in capacity?