Everytime
Still, still not a word. It hasn’t been a word, and maybe it will never be a word.
Submitted 16 hours ago by
Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club to historymemes@piefed.social
https://thelemmy.club/pictrs/image/37f07961-0153-4dd2-8604-0d2f30e30e59.jpeg
Everytime
Still, still not a word. It hasn’t been a word, and maybe it will never be a word.
The great thing about language is that it’s constantly evolving and changing because of how people use it and seek to communicate with each other. New words are added to our lexicon all the time. For example, imagine telling someone in 1980 to just go Google something.
That must irritate you everytime.
Maybe they’re just Britney Spears fans!
“communists”
Might I introduce you to Anakin’s thesis on TToDPTW?
I would much prefer a coöp commonwealth economy and a democracy with ranked choice vote, a mixed member proportional legislature, and a council of department secretaries as executive branch.
My issue with other socialist is that Leninists will never give up power for “the state to wither away” and anarchists are too allergic to any form of struct even if it is an entirely voluntary confederation style system.
I’m an anarchist, I’d be all in for helping manage a federated co-op structure.
tomenzgg@midwest.social 14 hours ago Tell me more about this commonwealth economy? It sounds interesting.
I thought we were an autonomous collective.
In order to create a stateless society, wouldn’t you first have to conquer all other states? Otherwise you still have a de facto state, whether you call it that or not.
I guess in theory that’s where the socialist state comes in to transition from capitalism to communism
No. You wouldn’t first have to conquer all other states.
What make a state exist in your society is the existence of violence, not the existence of other states.
Ah, so you’ve invented your own definition of the word “state”. And if a “state” is defined by the mere existence of violence, than a stateless society is an impossibility.
Rigth?