At this stage I’d settle for no more billionaires, and for corrupt politicians to be jailed. Too much to ask?
How it goes everytime
Submitted 1 month ago by 
Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club to historymemes@piefed.social
https://thelemmy.club/pictrs/image/37f07961-0153-4dd2-8604-0d2f30e30e59.jpeg
Comments
skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
nialv7@lemmy.world 1 month ago
how can you maintain a proletariat rule without a dictatorship? /s
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
See, if dictators call themselves proles, then it totally is a proletariat. After all, we’re all equals, my comrades.
Jayjader@jlai.lu 1 month ago
every time *so far
homer_simpson_meme.jpg
kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago Rigth?
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Everytime
Still, still not a word. It hasn’t been a word, and maybe it will never be a word.
Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Did you understand what was communicated? If so…
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Techranger@infosec.pub 1 month ago
I cri evrytiem
tmyakal@infosec.pub 1 month ago
The great thing about language is that it’s constantly evolving and changing because of how people use it and seek to communicate with each other. New words are added to our lexicon all the time. For example, imagine telling someone in 1980 to just go Google something.
king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That must irritate you everytime.
feannag@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Maybe they’re just Britney Spears fans!
Zorque@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“communists”
Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I would much prefer a coöp commonwealth economy and a democracy with ranked choice vote, a mixed member proportional legislature, and a council of department secretaries as executive branch.
My issue with other socialist is that Leninists will never give up power for “the state to wither away” and anarchists are too allergic to any form of struct even if it is an entirely voluntary confederation style system.
naught101@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m an anarchist, I’d be all in for helping manage a federated co-op structure.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Managing is literally the easiest part. Finding someone to volunteer for shit shoveling duty is a lot harder.
tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 month ago Tell me more about this commonwealth economy? It sounds interesting.
robocall@lemmy.world 1 month ago
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 month ago
I thought we were an autonomous collective.
MrShankles@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I thought we were an anarcho-syndicalist commune
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
In order to create a stateless society, wouldn’t you first have to conquer all other states? Otherwise you still have a de facto state, whether you call it that or not.
Ariselas@piefed.ca 1 month ago
I guess in theory that’s where the socialist state comes in to transition from capitalism to communism
marcos@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No. You wouldn’t first have to conquer all other states.
What make a state exist in your society is the existence of violence, not the existence of other states.
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Ah, so you’ve invented your own definition of the word “state”. And if a “state” is defined by the mere existence of violence, than a stateless society is an impossibility.
thatradomguy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Might I introduce you to Anakin’s thesis on TToDPTW?