After like 80 years you probably think you’re safe.
There’s no statute of limitations on murder. In the US. I assume since much of our law descends from British law, it’s much the same there.
He’s safe from execution, at least; the UK abolished it.
streetman@lemmy.world 6 days ago
[yahoo.com/…/jack-ripper-case-identity-breakthroug… ](Article can be found here)
It’s a bit misleading and the tests were performed in 2019 to a disputed shawl owned by the suspect. This wouldn’t hold up in modern court let alone Victorian age court.
BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
Just to be pedantic, the “let alone” turn of phrase is meant to imply that the second thing has a higher standard. So in this case it should be corrected to “this wouldn’t hold up in a Victorian age court, let alone a modern one.”
dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 days ago
Victorian courts have a higher standard because they didn’t allow DNA evidence
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 days ago
What makes you think victorian court has higher standards than modern day ones?
edg@lemmy.world 6 days ago
I think they mean the standards were lower in Victorian times.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 days ago
He’s saying they wouldn’t understand the DNA claim in the first place.