Why would you study anything with literature if you had never read a book before? This sound like a colossal waste of time and money. My theory is that if you were good at anything or had an interest in a particular topic, you would study something else like engineering, medicine, or law (I exclude the case that you may be genuinely interested in literature). Thus, many of those who study literature have no idea what they should study else and probably think that they can always get through a course which is about book. Why? Probably rich family pressured them into studying instead of posting stuff on Instagram or TikTok.
The Elite College Students Who Can’t Read Books
Submitted 2 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
Comments
thfi@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Ajen@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
The article is about a course that’s required for all freshmen, not just lit majors. Here’s the first sentence of the article:
Nicholas Dames has taught Literature Humanities, Columbia University’s required great-books course, since 1998.
Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It still applies. If you cannot X, but X is required, don’t do it.
If you cannot read books, higher education is probably not your thing.
SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I can corroborate that it gets crazy even in courses expecting high literacy. I had the painful experience of teaching a 3rd year course in communication studies that was part of the media production stream. It required writing preproduction documentation and a script. There were a lot of questionable attempts but there’s always a range of interest and skill, right? One student, and let me remind you this is third year at a university, I called into office hours. I’m a fan of poetry, so I just had to be sure that she wasn’t cleverly lampooning Gertrude Stein in some ironic way. Sadly, no, she just had no fucking clue how to write ANYTHING coherent. Amazing.
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
Apparently in many highschools and middle schools, literature classes will only make students study an excerpt or article on the subject, not the entire book. When they get to college and their professors drop a book on them, it’s unexpected, because they thought it would be more articles and excerpts.
2ugly2live@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Seems like the schools (not the colleges) that aren’t preparing these kids. They mentioned some students saying they haven’t had to read a full book prior to college. That’s not good. Not everything can be learned through short-form media. And it’s such a disserve to the kids. Reading can be such a joy.
Norin@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I teach philosophy at a community college.
I have learned from my students that their high schools didn’t ever require them to read a whole book or write much of anywhere. They also didn’t teach them some essential computer skills.
Strangest of all, it is apparently a common practice to award a base grade of 50% on all assignments, even for missing work.
So, my introductory philosophy class, which I have designed to be very easy (you likely get an A for showing up, talking, and turning things in on time) ends up being more difficult than anything they’ve ever done in school so far because I’m asking them to read 10 or so pages a week and write around 500 words a week.
2ugly2live@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s so wild. Some of these kids want to go on to be doctors, lawyers, etc., but they won’t be able to read the needed text. That’s so unfair to them.
DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I’m curious what the downvoted was for.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I didn’t downvote but personally I’m not sure what’s dystopian about fewer people reading long, dense books and choosing to consume other, shorter media instead. It’s like saying less people watching opera is dystopian. What’s the problem with a medium becoming unpopular?
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
I think the worry is that, sometimes problems or concepts are too complex to be distilled into a short form. If someone only ever gets the short version of everything, they can lose a tremendous amount of nuance, and may come away with a misinformed or caricaturized version.
This video on the subject does a goof job of delving into the issue.
Tyfud@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I suspect it’s the loss of attention span, in this case.
DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I am a professor. I’m fine with choosing to consume shorter media - I read very few novels any more either. I think the point that the students appear unable to read long form. It actually matches up with my own experience where incoming students have never had to write long form either.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
People can’t write with a feather quill by candlelight anymore either.
Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You didn’t read the article, did you? It’s not about reading tomes but books. Doesn’t matter if it’s an e-book or a really long slideshow on TikTok. These kids have never read the entirety of the text which is ordinarily contained in a single tome regardless of the format in which they didn’t read it. If you don’t understand why this is alarming, odds are you haven’t either. And considering you didn’t even read the article…
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
False equivalences are fun.
toiletobserver@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I went to college, can’t read books, brain won’t let me. I read short form only. College was difficult.