We can’t blame chatgpt for the change in headline writing over the last few years, though.
ChatGPT is changing the way we write. Here’s how – and why it’s a problem.
Submitted 1 month ago by 101@feddit.org to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Contentedness@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
garretble@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Maybe we need LLMs to (first of all, we don’t need LLMs for this) rewrite headlines any time the word “slams” gets in there.
underthesign@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Writers Slam The One Thing They Hate About AI.
fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
My favorite tell is when a write-up starts with a verbose explanation of given knowledge on a subject. Yes, we all know what ‘World Wide Web’ and ‘Internal Combustion Engines’ are.
Get to the f’ing point.
vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
This is just basic “undergrad pads word count” strategy.
Zexks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No “we” all don’t. Ask anyone who works support how fucking stupid the general population is about shit they use daily. Let alone stuff they heard years/decades ago.
spongebue@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ask anyone who works support how fucking stupid the general population
They’re going to have a huge selection bias though - much of the “general population” will start elsewhere with things like documentation or brains.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s become, by far, the most obvious tell for AI generated content for me. It’s just so damn unnatural.
woop_woop@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Seriously, fuck off with the AI shit. At best it’s intelligent regex. And “intelligence” here means a specific thing.
wicked@programming.dev 1 month ago
Do you even know what regex is? Your neural network needs more training.
lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 month ago
Do you even know what regex is?
Do anyone? I know I just add more .+? until it works
1984@lemmy.today 1 month ago
It’s a language model… Not a regexp. :)
I agree it’s overhyped and I think we will have these models in everything from phones to cars, giving us voice commands and summary functions.
It’s it going to become self aware anytime soon. :)
jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 month ago
i prefer the upgraded autocomplete analogy but yeah
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
What on Earth would that look like?
Your statement doesn’t even make sense it’s like saying it’s not intelligent it’s just a magic pen. Eh?
nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
intelligent regex
That would be much, much worse than what we actually have. Complex regex are positively Lovecraftian. You’d be chanting “Ia! Ia! Cthulhu ftaghn!” before you knew it.
WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they’re sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).
If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they’ll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.
IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 month ago
👌👍
Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Author: “write me a 4000 word article on why microplastics are bad
ChatGPT: generates 4000 words of text explaining what micro means, what plastic means, and paraphrasing the “controversy” section of the Wikipedia page on microplastics
Reader: “Summarise this article”
GhatGPT: “Microplastics are bad”
wicked@programming.dev 1 month ago
And in reality: chatgpt.com/…/66f519a6-1348-8002-96eb-bb61fb25287…
Womble@lemmy.world 1 month ago
woah woah woah, lets have less of this looking at reality here. We all know generative AI is a fad that never works for anything and anyone using it is an idiot, we don’t need to have our prejudices challenged