Found via the author’s Mastodon Post
Generally, the media has focused on the (mainly) men whose names and desires were taken from the company’s subscriber database and shared with the world. […] Ashley Madison was never really about that. Avid Life Media, its parent company, wasn’t in the business of sex, it was in the business of bots. Its site became a prototype for what social media platforms such as Facebook are becoming: places so packed with AI-generated nonsense that they feel like spam cages, or information prisons where the only messages that get through are auto-generated ads.
KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
I think a lot of dating sites are using bots or other means to push engagement at this point since online dating for women can be summed up like this:
Image
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Fuck now I want a hot dog
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 months ago
Image
AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
How’d you get this picture of my Grindr DMs?
wagesj45@kbin.run 4 months ago
I remember online dating looking more like this from a male perspective.
limelight79@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Back when I was in online dating (I got married in 2010, so it has been a very long time), this is how it seemed to work in the hetero arena:
So, both could be true in relation to the image.
I remember a guy once telling me that basically you have to respond to EVERY AD and hope something sticks. I never did that, and I felt bad for what the women must have had to deal with when I heard that. I had very limited success - dates with, at most, two or three women, and none of those really went anywhere. I ended up marrying someone from work instead.