Now this don’t make a damn lick of sense. If we need guns to protect ourselves from gubmint tyranny, and y’all plan to put that feller back in the gubment, then what the hell does he need a gun for?
Gun group to defend Trump right to carry
Submitted 5 months ago by wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee to conservative@lemm.ee
Comments
Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Here’s what the same gun group said about Hunter Biden using a 2A argument in his case. The judge denied the argument.
that’s right, that Hunter Biden, who, despite his father’s long standing and well known disdain for the second amendment, is now turning to the exercise of his rights to shield him from prosecution. “Rules for thee but not for me” eh Hunter?
niktemadur@lemmy.world 5 months ago
This sounds like undigested talking points being regurgitated in a warm mental vomit stew, with lots of little chunks of everything in there.
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Dude probably has no idea how to properly handle a gun, AND he has a permanent secret service detail.
This has zero impact on his life, other than politically.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Not permanent. He will lose his security at some point. Obama changed the direction of how long people keep secret service details.
Personally, I think they should keep them for life. Yes it is a tax payer expense but for their service, I think it is a good expense.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months ago
Of course you believe that Obama did something about it and you can’t have that!
Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Trump was never of any service to the country. He has only ever been a problem.
WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Are you saying that you reckon an ex-president, who commits any crime (before, during or after serving) should still be protected by the SS?
Including convictions for murder? Extortion? Rape? Child rape?