“Nu” does not mean “New” it refers to a musical genre known for it’s simplistic mass appeal.
Comment on What are the biggest red flags when talking with a Trek "fan"?
CitizenKong@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I mean, technically everything from TNG onwards would be NuTrek and Kelvin-stuff would be NuNuTrek, or rather Re-Trek, since it’s a reboot.
Corgana@startrek.website 4 weeks ago
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It actually does. At least in this context.
Corgana@startrek.website 4 weeks ago
It actually does not.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It in fact does. Not sure what it is you think it means.
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
NuTrek started when they did a full visual reboot, including completely changing the look of the Klingons: TMP.
Then it got worse, when they followed that up with a grimdark shoot-em-up that felt nothing like Trek. These people aren’t even fans of the show!
livingcoder@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
Who wanted a visual reboot of the Klingons?
Discovery had so many problems for me: ship flies on magic mushrooms, her mom basically doesn’t care about her anymore by the end of it - the show-starting plot line, and the Klingons look like sweaty orcs.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Yeah, who wanted this visual reboot between old trek and nutrek?
![]5http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IVlXENpr49E/Vg625g9pRCI/AAAAAAAAAVs/xKiB8mb5nuw/s1600/klingons.jpg)
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
What’s wrong with the magic mushrooms? It’s not like Trek was ever hard sci-fi when it came to how the ships fly. For crying out loud, in Voyager they went so fast they were everywhere at once, then Tom Paris and Janeway had salamander babies.
livingcoder@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
It just felt so cliche, that the crazy discovery they make is that the strange stuff is alive. The writers couldn’t make it sentient because then they’d need to explain why it’s just like the Great Lake but different from the Great Lake. It just exists and Star Fleet happens to be the only ones who know about it.
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Gene Roddenberry, I guess. IMO the guy really fell off when he turned Trek into a saturday morning cartoon show. But yeah, sweaty orc is right, just look at these monstrosities:
Image
livingcoder@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
lol, I love that you’re conflating the creator having the budget to make the show more in-line with his original vision with someone else making a lousy change for no clear reason. It’s a nice knee-slapper of a comment you have right there. Good luck with it.
lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
You are talking about the TOS movies/TNG? Never understand the forehead thing either
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Yeah, I’m facetiously comparing the 1979 arguments over bumpy headed Klingons to the 2017 arguments over cone headed Klingons. What’s “new” keeps on changing, but the arguments about it stay eerily familiar.