Comment on Work from home

• kboy101222@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yeah, but here in the US, if you can work even the simplest job you shouldn’t qualify for disability! That just encourages people to enjoy communism! These literally half blind mfers need to get off their ass and get to work, the lazy sons of bitches! Don’t they love freedom?

  source

  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This is wrong, because you’re talking about disability insurance in a comment thread about disability discrimination.

    Disability is very broadly defined for the purpose of disability discrimination laws, which is the context of this comment chain.

    Disability is defined specific to a person’s work skills for the purpose of long term disability insurance (like the US’s federally administered Social Security disability insurance). Depending on the program/insurance type, it might require that you can’t hold down any meaningful job, caused by a medical condition that lasts longer than a year.

    For things like short term disability, the disability is defined specific to that person’s preexisting job. Someone who gets an Achilles surgery that prevents them from operating the pedals of a motor vehicle for a few weeks would be “disabled” for the purpose of short term disability insurance if they’re a truck driver, and might not even be disabled if their day job is something like being a telemarketer who sits at a desk for their job.

    source

    • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Just wanted to expand on this

      Depending on the program/insurance type, it might require that you can’t hold down any meaningful job, caused by a medical condition that lasts longer than a year.

      For SSI or SSDI, you basically have to be bed bound (“less than sedentary”), have a condition severe enough it meets the strict requirements in SSA’s listings of impairments, or have a mental condition that prevents you from being at all able to fulfill the demands of unskilled work. The rules get more lenient after age 50 the older you get though.

      source
    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nah man, freedom.

      source
• Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Offsides, bud!

  source

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Off-side!

    source
• Zink@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Iirc for the US government to consider you disabled due to vision, your GOOD eye has to be 20/200 or worse.

  So yeah if you only have one eye and you can barely read the giant E at the top of the vision chart, sorry!

  source

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Not true. Look up the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by the EEOC. Here, I’ll do it for you. But if I am mistaken, I’d love to know where it defines the vision criteria for exclusion.

    Actually, when I was looking it up, it sounds like you’re talking about being considered legally blind and qualifying for Social Security disability benefits, which is not the same as being protected under the ADA.

    source

    • Zink@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      The latter. The government considering you disabled therefore you qualify for disability benefits.

      source
• 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Pun intended, I’m assuming?

  source

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Not really, it was a figure of speech, which I realized would be taken as a pun and decided to leave it. It unintentionally fit the theme.

    source

    • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nice! Makes it even better.

      source