Comment on The second matchup of the tournament

Thcdenton@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  because man probably won’t eat you.

  that’s why I dumped my last boyfriend

  source

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    he ate you? Damn, that’s rough.

    source

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No, no, because he didn’t eat out.

      source

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        sometimes blatantly misinterpreting statements is funny

        source
    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      it’s only rough when I don’t shave my hairy taco.

      source

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        in that case i should probably correct rough to tough, since we’re talking about cannibalism here.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Woozythebear@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The bear also isn’t going to rape you and I would say the chances of the bear eating you and the man eating you are the same.

  source

  • Thcdenton@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You forgot to change accounts before posting again 🐻

    source
  • GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Bear detected

    source
  • Atin@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Just make sure you have marshmallows

    source
• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  cancels surprise birthday party for Koko Jr

  source
• Kase@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  To be clear, I’m not trying to get into a man v bear debate here. But, like, a man could still kill you, right? Is that better than being eaten? I mean, I guess it’s probably less likely. I’m no expert on bears or random forest men.

  source

  • daltotron@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But, like, a man could still kill you, right? Is that better than being eaten?

    I mean generally being eaten entails entrails leaking out, whereas getting killed could entail any number of things. Neck snap, choked out, slit throat, whatever. I dunno if your average idiot man is gonna be as proficient of a killer as a bear, even if they happen to be a murderer or like, just evil, right, so, I dunno. Kind of a toss up. Me personally, I would rather not have my guts spilled out, ribcage crushed, spine snapped, bones gnawed on while I’m still conscious, slowly lose blood and lose consciousness over the course of 30 minutes to an hour. I mean I guess theoretically a man could do those things too, but I dunno many men that could. Maybe like, the mike tyson of 40 years ago?

    I guess the argument I’m making hinges on the idea that humans are generally bad at killing in a physiological sense, and their need to kind of, up themselves in the game means that they tend to get filtered into a bunch of more painless and efficient approaches relative to the kind of uncaring cruelty of nature more generally. But then I dunno, humans also have a capacity for needless cruelty and torture, so I’d also be betting my chances that I don’t get shafted and stuck with like, a super jacked serial killer that can torture me with their bare hands, which there’s probably only like 2 or 3 of in the world. Maybe more if you include government contracted ones.

    source