From what I read, the calls actually evaporated opposition to the bill.
Which, I’m NGL, if you’re worried about an app being used by a foreign adversary to encourage anti-social behavior in your youth, a bunch of people calling in acting like drug addicts getting their drugs taken away is only going to erase doubts.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
It was a 50-0 to pass the commission and then go to the House floor for a vote and then the Senate for a vote and finally signed into law by the president unless he vetoes it, which is possible imo.
Honestly, teenagers and old people are the sorts of folks that need to be protected from themselves, I might just call in to my local representative to voice my support of forced sale or even outright ban.
ikidd@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Now do Facebook.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
Love to, I think the 5 Bn USD FTC fine was a little light considering no jailtime was given.
affiliate@lemmy.world 9 months ago
what are you even trying to say here? that it’s okay for politicians to ignore entire demographics? or that it’s only okay for them to ignore entire demographics if, ultimately, it’s left up to a different group of politicians to pass the law?
i don’t use tiktok or have any interest in the app, but it’s still very alarming to see a vote go through 50-0 despite a “nonstop” flood of calls opposing it.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
Ignore them? Gosh no. Protect them. Literally what I said.
affiliate@lemmy.world 9 months ago
“protect them from themselves” is what you said. which carries the connotation that they don’t know what’s best for themselves and aren’t qualified to make judgments about those things. this is different from simply “protecting them”.
Misconduct@startrek.website 9 months ago
You’re not doing it to protect people. It’s ridiculous that you’d even pretend to be.
Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 months ago
Yeah honestly if a bunch of addicted teens and old people were calling me screaming that I can’t take away their drug of choice when that’s not even what’s happening, and it’s not being taken away just moved to where there can be more control on quality… Then I would be really considering the damage this is doing to them.
I don’t know if supporting the junkies being taken advantage of is the altruistic take that these “absolute freedom” supporters think it is.
Misconduct@startrek.website 9 months ago
The fact that you guys just ate up that rhetoric without any hesitation… Like, you just happily believe it’s a bunch of “addicted old people and teenagers”? Is this reddit? Did I make a wrong turn at common sense and critical thinking?
Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 months ago
Uh dude… I know people addicted that got the email to message their representative. They will stop talking in a conversation and pull out their phone and just scroll through a few videos.
I struggle to believe so many would be messaging just out of laziness but don’t question that being the age groups that would respond most to that kind of targeted messaging into action.
Clent@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Nanny State.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
“Mr. Legislator I am 84 and I need my Heroin but the federal government keeps cracking down on my supplier, please stop taking away all my Heroin Mr. Legislator. Also, force my bank to let me transfer 85,000 USD to India, it’s really important that I do that before the 27th.”
Clent@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yes. This is called Nanny State.
Rather than educate the populace, take away the tools. Of course, another tool will just rise to the surface but it will make a lot of people feel really good that they did something.
I do appreciate all of the reactionary statements. I don’t use TikTok but I do believe in freedom. Reducing freedoms, no matter how well intentioned does not solve societies problems.
Misconduct@startrek.website 9 months ago
It’s not just teenagers and old people anyway. That’s just some bullshit rhetoric. Millennials/middle age folk are abundant on TikTok as well as young adults.
The audacity of some of you to jump into action just to spite “teenagers and old people” is shameful. So easily manipulated.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
Right, sorry, it’s fine to let teenagers and old people be harmed as long as the company can continue to profit on consenting adults as well. /sarcasm
Misconduct@startrek.website 9 months ago
How are they being harmed? Why was it so easy for them to make you believe this? Also, who asked you to protect anyone with your one petty little email lmao
BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
Please, big daddy government, protect me from the freedom of choice. I cannot be trusted to consume without your permission.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
LMAO pay attention in school, kid, you seem like the type who is going to need it.
fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 9 months ago
They should really educate people about foreign threats like the CCP and Kremlin.
furikuri@programming.dev 9 months ago
Me when I find out that it’s illegal to sell your organs for profit