I don’t believe piracy is treated as stealing from a legal sense, already.
Comment on Why is Google allowed to remove purchases from our Play Store accounts without telling us?
FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s purchasing ≠ owning, then piracy ≠ stealing
ripcord@lemmy.world 9 months ago
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
That’s true. If I steal 20 copies of some avengers movie from Walmart and give them away on the street, I’ll pay a couple thousand dollars in fines, tops. If I’m caught seeding an avengers movie to one person downloading from me in Serbia, I’ll be fined more money than most people make in their entire lives
Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Ok but this isn’t purchasing outright it is basically leasing. It says so in the tos. The issue here is ppl don’t read tos or they don’t care and pay anyway. Ppl like that have zero right to complain.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Amazing how you can talk so coherently with that corporate dick taking up so much space in your mouth.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
How dare the average person not have the time or attention span to read a 28 page document in legalese that explains what exactly they’re doing
It’s not like purposefully dense and overlong TOS is a known strategy to hide bullshit that later gets thrown out in court or anything
Urist@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
That person probably also think people who get shot are stupid for not moving out of the bullet’s path. “It is not so hard, it moves in a straight line you idiots”.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
“Daniel Shaver should have just listened to philip brailsford’s commands”
NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
So you don’t have time for that? Spend two hours reading stipulations for a service that you might use for a decade or longer? That you might spend thousands of your currency on? What happened to the world. So fast. So furious.
d3lta19@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
The button to install a paid app literally says BUY. If that doesn’t mean purchase I don’t what else it could mean.
Auli@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
I can buy a vacation doesn’t mean I own the place I’m going.
lemonnade@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
It’s literally just a convention, a design choice. It doesn’t really mean anything.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
buy (third-person singular simple present buys, present participle buying, simple past bought, past participle bought or (archaic, rare, dialectal) boughten)
(transitive, ditransitive) To obtain (something) in exchange for money or goods.
“I’m going to buy my father something nice for his birthday.”
When I search the Play Store for Geometry Dash, and click the lil button that says “$1.99,” I get this page. It sure as shit looks like what I’m about to buy is Geometry Dash, the video game. When I click “Buy,” I’m not at all expecting to “buy” a temporary, permanently revokable license to play the game for now. I’m expecting to own the 1s and 0s that are downloaded to my device. Hiding legalese in the T&C that nobody clicks saying “actually buy means lease” is legal, and it should not be legal, because it’s misleading as hell. They should not be allowed to redefine words in T&C.
experbia@lemmy.world 9 months ago
OK but piracy isn’t stealing it is basically a harmless free copy. The issue here is corporations want to have their cake and eat it too, but to prohibit us all from either having or eating any cake ever. Corpos like that have zero right to my consideration or care.
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months ago
Yeah, okay, except the iTunes and Facebook TOSes are longer than King Lear. Eventually a judge nullified a TOS on the basis that no-one ever reads those anyway.
Thanks to odious TOSes, the average American commirs three felonies a day, violations of the CFAA for which some whistle-blowers and journalists are serving sentences similar to [assassin] Scott Roeder (for the murder of Dr. George Tiller). The rest of us are not serving such sentences but for one officer or official who wants us to disappear.
In the meantime journalists continue to get charged with such violations, usually when their investigating something embarrassing to current administrations. The EFF has repeatedly raised a stink about this, but hasn’t yet been able to change the law.
Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 months ago
You 👏 should ,👏 expect 👏 this 👏 it 👏isn’t👏the👏first👏time
psud@lemmy.world 9 months ago
TOS documents are designed not to be read.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 months ago
I recall a while back someone did a study that there are not enough hours in the day for an average person to actually read all the TOS documents they’re expected to agree to. The idea that people can or should be responsible for knowing what’s in a TOS is a legal fiction.
Auli@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
Maybe we should get a GPT started to make short and understandable TOS.
Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I never said or implied what you assume I’m implying.
Get some literacy.
NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
Some people don’t get how you can separate understanding the logic of something and not supporting it at the same time.
Don’t worry, that is normal. Im getting laughed at left and right for having my own root-server with all my services running on it, all FOSS.
Most of them were born with google already existing, it is part of nature. They haven’t seen a giant go down yet.
TwoGems@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Nice try, Google
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Hey look it’s the libertarian I was talking about in my other comment
cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 9 months ago
!= is better
dukk@programming.dev 9 months ago
Outside of programming circles I’ve been surprised how little people now what != means.
grayman@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Despite claims, math and logic are not important skills according to many.
GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org 9 months ago
Are you implying that my math professors do not think math and logic are important just because they used
≠
instead of!=
?
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I paid for the whole Unicode, so I’m gonna use the whole ꙮ𐐘彁 Unicode
Ad4mWayn3@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Partially agree, because if purchasing == owning (which it should), then piracy is still != stealing
woodgen@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Piracy is never stealing, since you are not removing anything from anyone. This does not include actual piracy, the one with ships and rum.