My upload speed is 10mbit/s. It’s 2024, and this is ridiculous. I pay over $80 a month for this internet in one of the largest cities in the United States. I live in a very populated part of the city, too.
I fucking hate ISP’s.
Comment on Faster than ever: Wi-Fi 7 standard arrives
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 10 months ago
Will it make my ISP give me more internets to push through that WiFi? No? Then it isn’t going to change my world, sadly.
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
ripcord@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Which city. If you dont mind? Curious which is so bad.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Mine was that in Sacramento, CA 2 years ago
Now it’s 120 for 100 both ways out in the rural parts of CA
Tehhund@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeah, it will help and it won’t. If you’re uploading through a typical cable internet connection, WiFi will almost never be the bottleneck. But if you’re streaming 4k in a part of your house that doesn’t have good coverage while other people use the same connection, it could make a difference.
I do a lot of streaming from my desktop to my TVs and I occasionally have bandwidth problems, so this could help that. And I have 300 up / 300 down fiber Internet, and in parts of my house I have problems getting anywhere close to that on WiFi. So WiFi 7 might help with those cases even if in the end your ISP is usually the bottleneck.
Rootiest@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If you are at the edge of your Wi-Fi range I suspect this won’t help as much as you think
ryannathans@aussie.zone 10 months ago
My ISP gives 1000mb down, currently no wifi 6 device can fully utilise that unless it’s practically kissing the access point. So it will improve throughput over wifi 6. If your ISP doesn’t deliver more than ~50mb, you might not notice
brian@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
While I think most agree with you, it’s important to note there is more to networking than WAN access. Streaming 4k in your home network over WiFi sounds pretty awesome for security cameras and other self-hosted medias.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I already have Ethernet runs.
model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 10 months ago
As your ANAL Attorney, I advise you to take less Psyllium Fiber Optic Husk to prevent further Ethernet runs.
Drusenija@lemmy.world 10 months ago
With the number of people renting on the rise due to house prices in many countries around the world, running cables isn’t an option for everyone (and even when it is, not everyone wants to actually do it).
Having more options available for people to move large amounts of data around their home is never a bad thing.
deweydecibel@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Who needs 4k security camera footage streaming in their own home?
The media center is far more relevant here, but again, current speeds are pretty adequate for the majority of people.
Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
People who think the cameras will stop people from breaking in and stealing their shit.
Astarii_Tyler@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Cameras are for insurance
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
You forget the ones who want the cops to pay for the broken door.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 10 months ago
The thing you need is just a box that looks like it could be a camera. The most you can expect is that it is a minor deterrent and the footage will basically do nothing for you.
jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
For now
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 10 months ago
Sure, though in my world none of my networking needs exceed the capabilities provided by the current WiFi generation, thus it remains unchanged. Nor will I see any benefit from it unless I conduct a thorough review and replacement of all impacted devices in my world to also accommodate WiFi 7, which I will not be doing.
ripcord@lemmy.world 10 months ago
But I can already do 4k streaming over my 5g wifi