Cruelty for revenge’s sake, I’d say.
Comment on "Oopsie"
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 month ago
Wouldn’t be me, cruelty for cruelty’s sake, but I respect the choice without objection.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 month ago
PugJesus@piefed.social 1 month ago
Not even. The hangman, John C. Woods, was probably a sadist who simply enjoyed killing people slowly, unfortunately.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Oh, shit. At least he did that to literal death row Nazis.
PugJesus@piefed.social 1 month ago
Yeah. One of those occasions where it’s like, sick fuck, but no tears for his victims either.
MohamedMoney@feddit.org 1 month ago
I’m just musing here, but isn’t revenge just another form of cruelty? Revenge gaines nothing, it loses more. It only achieves itself but then evaporates like cotton candy in a raccoon’s hand.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 month ago revenge often gains nothing.
sometimes it gains a lot.
personal experience.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Revenge can be cruel. But it doesn’t need to be. One is getting back at someone who wronged you, the other is revelling in inflicting a wrong to someone. Different concepts.
- HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 month ago
people like to pretend that one is justice and the other is revenge though. don’t deny them their illusion
PugJesus@piefed.social 1 month ago
But it tastes sweet, like cotton candy in the mouth.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 month ago
Ah yes commiting one of the same cruelties the nazis did while feeling morally superior for it, truly one of the moves of all time
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
> Police arrest kidnapper
‘Hypocrites.’
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 month ago
Tolerance must end with the intolerant, and all that.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 month ago
Not tolerating nazis and torturing them are clearly the same yes