Comment on Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations

shyguyblue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  GenAI is the ultimate demoware.

  source

  • shyguyblue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Just one more data center, bro! Promise!

    source
  • dvoraqs@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What isn’t? Everything is growing, decaying, or changing in some way, honestly.

    source

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      AI is the most rushed to market product I think I’ve ever seen in my life. It makes Cyberpunk’s release like like a polished gem in comparison. Yes, things evolve over their life cycle for better or worse, but none of this other things have been so ingrained in everything, cost even a fraction of LLMs, both monetarily and environmentally, it sucked as hard.

      AI is a different monster. A shitty shitty monster.

      source

      • Corngood@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It’s because CEOs don’t play cyberpunk, but they did try chatgpt and got an immediate boner thinking about all the people they could lay off.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Strider@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The thing is, it’s not rushed. ‘AI’ as in what we call LLM today exists for quite a few years now and is just a tool which is used for a lot of I’ll fitting uses. Training also has its limits and it will not suddenly not hallucinate or get sentient.

        Yet it was sold this way. It’s the sunk cost fallacy, stupidity and the attempt to cut literally every corner. And it’s failing hard.

        source
  • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Can’t tell if serious.

    source
• CosmoNova@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Yes because it makes people talk about that instead of their love affair with Palantir and their passionate support for Israel.

  source

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    All good, I can hate them for more than one thing!

    source
• phar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Demos are very often an example of in progress works or technology. That literally happens all the time.

  source

  • Epzillon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Doesnt really matter IMO. If you have known bugs and flaws you dont showcase those, or if they are present in the showcase you atleast adress them and show what is to be expected upon release. NVIDIA just flat out didnt care. As soon as motion increases the artefacting is crazy. How do you even decide that this is remotely good enough for a demo? 

    ImageImage

    source

    • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Nvidia hears people like motion blur and AI slop so they put some AI slop in their motion blur.

      source

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Ugh. “Everyone is doing BLOOM, lets also do BLOOM but at +150% more!”

        I remember that, motion blur came after and now I guess ai 😓

        source
    • Gsus4@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Image

      source
    • phar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Okay but that is not what the person said or what the poster above quoted as being the best part. I’m not commenting on the overall performance I’m just saying that demos very often are exactly what that sentence implies they shouldn’t be.

      source
  • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    And yet, they chose to demo a broken technology with obvious bugs and flaws. The demos from tech companies are supposed to make people excited, not recoil in disgust.

    This isn’t some tiny company, either. It’s fucking nVidia, who supposedly has the money to create a good demo.

    source