Each and every individual should have been arrested then and there. Imagine walking into a major criminal trial with a film camera on your shoulder.
Comment on Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial
eleijeep@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who is presiding over the trial, ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned.
“This is very serious,” she said.
PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Isn’t it usual procedure that everyone else enters the courtroom and takes their places before the judge walks in? So the team would have had ample opportunity to film, record and facially-recognize the jury before Judge Kuhl made them take off the spyglasses.
RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
The Judge also ordered them to dispose of anything they had already recorded.
No way of actually checking that they did delete anything, but the possibility of footage or photos being leaked by a disgruntled worker, etc would be a massive liability for those two idiots.Kissaki@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
No way of actually checking that they did delete anything
Not a random individual, but I would expect a court to be able to do so.
kureta@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Yep. They should have been arrested.
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The judge controls when the jury is in the room. So the jury enters last, only after the judge orders them in. And the judge can order them out at any time to have discussions outside their presence, too.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned
For that reason alone, she should have held them in contempt and declared a mistrial before wasting anyone else’s time.
Zuck and his crew should’ve been arrested on-site for such an egregious breach of privacy and mockery of the justice system. And the next set of jurors should’ve been immediately informed of why there was a mistrial, and the very obvious danger of the plantiff having even one frame of video with a jurors face in it.
Instead, he got free viral marketing.
What a fucking clownshow.
PokerChips@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
No charges?
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Holy shit.
Kudos to this judge for knowing their shit and acting on it. I love it.
Eximius@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I mean… That’s their job… But yes!
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Is it though? In Donald’s America?
Eximius@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Oh sorry… I guess I was projecting…
Image
PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
She didn’t do anything though. Each and every individual should have been immediately charged and arrested. It’s a felony to film in a court room without permission. Every dipshit wearing those glasses should spend a month in a cell before the trial continues.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Acting on it? I mean, I guess opening and closing your mouth is technically action.