Comment on Americans rarely refer to the US as America

EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• Witchfire@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m a US citizen and lived there most of my life but refuse to call myself American. I’d rather call myself after my home state or country of birth, It’s an embarrassment.

  Helps that I live abroad though

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Sir this is Wendy’s

    source

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      Sir (or madam), they are not a “sir.”

      source

      • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨47⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

        Sir this is Wendy’s

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• NarrativeBear@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  To add to the confusion. The Americas (or America) comprise the landmasses of North and South America in the Western Hemisphere

  People living in North and South America (or the Americas) can also be called American or Americans if the were referring to the landmass.

  Strangely the United States IMO is the only country that seems to indicate the landmass its situated on when using the full name, the United States of America. Not the mention the indication of a unity of individual states.

  Several single-word English alternatives have been suggested over time, for example Columbian, Columbard, Fredonian, Frede, Unisian, United Statesian, Colonican, Appalacian, Usian, Washingtonian, Usonian, Uessian, U-S-ian, Uesican, and United Stater.

  Saying someone is a United Statesian or Statesian is probably the closest to how other countries like Canada (Canadian) or Mexico (Mexican) refer to themselves.

  source

  • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Call us Yankees because it’ll annoy the “the South will rise again” crowd

    source
  • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You do know it is actually named “the United Mexican States”, right? The name of the US is simply bad from the beginning and sometimes you can’t fix bad. Unless they take over all of the Americas, I guess. Then it’s a good name. Bad move, but good name.

    source

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s wild what a plot twist

      source
    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I do, most countries are a unitity of states, counties, or provinces.

      It would be so confusing if Mexico never settled on a name for its united states and called themselves the United States of America

      source

      • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        "Saying someone is a United Statesian or Statesian is probably the closest to how other countries like Canada (Canadian) or Mexico (Mexican) refer to themselves. If we forget that pretty much all other countries are a unity of states, counties, and or provinces. "

        I was refering to this part of your post. United Statesian or Statesian doesn’t make sense to correlate to Mexicans. They are both united states. As for Canada, I think they might be a confederacy and thus united states as well, but I also believe their semi-official name is actually Canada.

        As for most countries being united of sorts, I’m willing to accept that as an axiom, but I’m doubtful it is part of their cultural identity in the majority of cases. Maybe on a per capita basis.

        source
  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Thats’s cuz English Language sucks.

    In Chinese Language for example: A 美國人 (American (Country)) and a 美洲人 (American (Continent)). But in English both are “American”.

    Also so many syllabels converying so few info.

    Literally 4 syllabels for “American”

    But “美國人” or “美洲人” are both 3 syllabels and already contains [America-Country Person] or [America-Continent Person]

    Sorry, no offense to English speakers, but as a polyglot, I just had to comment this xD

    source

    • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      All languages convey information at roughly similar rates. Those with less information per syllable tend to say more syllables per minute. It’s a fascinating area of linguistics!

      All natural languages have ambiguities where the meaning of a word depends on context due to changes over time.

      source
  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Vespucciland -> Vespuccian.

    source

    • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      At this point, I think we should just call US people Indian.

      source
  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Several single-word English alternatives have been suggested

    Some of these make sense, but several of them would only refer to a specific area in the U.S. (e.g. Washingtonian) or are really out of left field (e.g. Fredonian).

    source

    • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I’m assuming Washingtonian would be refering to the man, not the state that refers to the man. I mean, it’s a silly name, but not for the reason you state.

      source

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Residents of Washington DC are also referred to as Washingtonians

        source

        • -> View More Comments