Keeps the poors out. — Cave Johnson, probably
Comment on outlawing pedestrians
mcv@lemmy.zip 1 day agoSo, why is there no pedestrian bridge?
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 1 day ago
NJ DOT controls Rt 3 that goes over the bridge. You can recommend it to them.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 day ago
The canal was there before the hotel, so that’s probably a question for whoever built a hotel in a place that doesn’t make any sense.
sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 1 day ago
knightly@pawb.social 1 day ago
Holy Shit, making it from the nearest hotel across the canal turns a 1-mile walk into a 6-mile hike =U
Image
That has to be deliberate, there’s no other excuse for it.
withabeard@feddit.uk 1 day ago
…
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 day ago
Deliberate in the sense that someone built a hotel on land that was cheap for reason?
GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 day ago
How much extra do you think it would have cost to add an 6’ walkway to the bridge when it was built, merely as a future-proofing mechanism? When your first thought is, “No one would ever want to walk from one side to the other instead of using some kind of transportation,” these are the kind of results you get.
mcv@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
A billion dollars for a pedestrian bridge? That thing had better be made of gold, then.
general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
found some figures about cost of bridge building and apparently if one were to construct a completely new pedestrian overpass/bridge over that canal would be on the ballpark of about 2-10 million dollars