So, why is there no pedestrian bridge?
Comment on outlawing pedestrians
hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The REASON it’s illegal and dangerous to walk from these hotels is there’s a damn whole canal between here and the stadium and the bridge is a limited-access highway. maps.app.goo.gl/5nK4bkNg9fHkWunn7
There isn’t a pedestrian bridge over the canal, that’s why you gotta get a ride.
mcv@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
knightly@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Holy Shit, making it from the nearest hotel across the canal turns a 1-mile walk into a 6-mile hike =U
That has to be deliberate, there’s no other excuse for it.
withabeard@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
American dream
…
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Deliberate in the sense that someone built a hotel on land that was cheap for reason?
GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 weeks ago
How much extra do you think it would have cost to add an 6’ walkway to the bridge when it was built, merely as a future-proofing mechanism? When your first thought is, “No one would ever want to walk from one side to the other instead of using some kind of transportation,” these are the kind of results you get.
mcv@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
A billion dollars for a pedestrian bridge? That thing had better be made of gold, then.
Tuuktuuk@nord.pub 2 weeks ago
Do you think that the city should engage a – civil engineering project to build a pedestrian bridge over a navigable canal?
Uhmm? Yes? Have you somehow missed that there’s a stadium on the other side of the canal? There are a lot of things in the southwest corner of the map, not just one hotel. I do not believe there’s any other country on this planet where this is even a question. That bridge would absolutely get built. Building the stadium cost a big sum of money. A simple pedestrian bridge costs something like 50 000 $, maybe 200 000 $ if you want a fancy one. How would it not be possible for the stadium to pay that? It’s an increase of about one percent to the project’s expenses.
And if they somehow forgot to include the necessary traffic connections in requirements for giving the permission to build the stadium, then I can assure you that the state is able to pay for a hundred grand for simple infrastructure.
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Keeps the poors out. — Cave Johnson, probably
hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
NJ DOT controls Rt 3 that goes over the bridge. You can recommend it to them.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
The canal was there before the hotel, so that’s probably a question for whoever built a hotel in a place that doesn’t make any sense.
sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 weeks ago
Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
That’s the reason I can’t simply walk to the nearby Denny’s if I wanted to; it’s on the otherside of 99 and there are no pedestrian crossings for MILES over it.
Woht24@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That is literal insanity
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
lmao fucking americans… “The government won’t let me walk on the highway, that’s the real tyranny!”
sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Also america: driving takes one mile, walking takes 6 miles to get to the same place.
BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I see some water there. Backpack inflatable kayak?
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Its not walking, so fine in the eyes of the law i guess?
Tuuktuuk@nord.pub 2 weeks ago
When will the pedestrian bridge be ready?
susi7802@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Sounds like bad planning.