Comment on MegaThread: Under 16 lockout/verification/ID required
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Please do not mention workarounds here
Why not? The eSafety commission offers online tutorials on workarounds.
Comment on MegaThread: Under 16 lockout/verification/ID required
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Please do not mention workarounds here
Why not? The eSafety commission offers online tutorials on workarounds.
No1@aussie.zone 4 days ago
You are sadly mistaken
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
No they won’t be.
Firstly it is technically impossible. Even China cannot do it.
Secondly, businesses need them for WFH.
Thirdly, the government is not implementing a block themselves. They are trying to pass on the unreasonable onus onto website owners.
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 days ago
Streaming companies routinely block VPNs, as does Reddit. There are security companies which aggregate and maintain lists of VPN IPs, which they sell to such companies. It is possible that use of such services could be made a baseline of “reasonable measures”.
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
It is a game of cat and mouse which China has not solved.
No1@aussie.zone 4 days ago
If the website owners do it, then ???
I already know a heap of VPN servers I can’t access youtube or reddit from.
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
I bet you most of them won’t
IP addresses change. Your VPN server will change them (if it is any good).
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 days ago
Technically impossible? Not at all. VPN companies have exit nodes with IP addresses. Those IP addresses are regularly banned by services like Netflix already.
Taleya@aussie.zone 4 days ago
Oh you can fuck right off with that.
No1@aussie.zone 4 days ago
Me? 😢
Taleya@aussie.zone 4 days ago
Le govt