Comment on same shit every day, on god

m3t00@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• Tattorack@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Yeah; somehow converting the plasma directly into electricity at a 1:1 ratio using… Uh… Dilithium or something.

  source

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I hate to break this to you, but chemically, dilithium is just a highly complex steam.

    source

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      What if we add some nutrinos? And then reverse the polarity? And maybe some antimatter?

      Wait, was dilithium just the media Star Trek used to go from reacting matter with antimatter, producing heat, causing the dilithium steam to expand, spinning a magnet inside a coil somewhere behind one of those access panels? Was antimatter just fancy futuristic coal powering the Enterprise’s steam engine!?

      source

      • Toes@ani.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Hold up, I think you’re onto something.

        There are episodes of the warp core exploding in slow mo. It’s just huge amounts of steam!

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• nekbardrun@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Not a better plan but just a curiosity as a physicist enthusiast.

  Regarding nuclear fission and nuclear waste (and ignoring the big elephant in the room that are nuclear weapons)…

  What are the technical difficulties to turn the radiation emitted by nuclear waste into electricity?

  I mean, if the nuclear waste is still radiating, it has stored energy that is radiated as photons, right?

  Then, we have the photo-electric effect which turns photons into moving electrons as long as the frequency surpasses a minimum threshold.

  Given that the radiation of nuclear waste has frequency way higher than UV, why can’t it be used to feed a photoelectric generator?

  Also, we have tons of nuclear waste, so the argument that a single rod doesn’t generate enough radiation seems kinda bogus since we could just store the nuclear waste into a safer recipient that turns the harmful rays directly into electricity and we have a shit-ton of them stored in thick lead or concrete barrels just so this radiation don’t harm the surroundings.

  .

  It is a genuine question that I had, but never had enough physics class to understand where this logic falls apart.

  Because, if it were feasible and “cheap”, I bet that the US would already be doing it and having access to “free energy” (not really, but a long-standing generator that doubles as removing nuclear waste from the ambient).

  source

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Given that the radiation of nuclear waste has frequency way higher than UV, why can’t it be used to feed a photoelectric generator?

    You’re probably using one of these right now (albeit indirectly)! They’re called Photovoltaic nuclear batteries and they’re critical to modern encryption. They ensure that encryption keys, which are stored in highly volatile memory where if power is ever lost the keys are immediately erased, never lose power unless the memory modules are physically disconnected.

    The reason they’re not used more extensively is that they just don’t produce very much power - the high-energy electromagnetic radiations are very difficult to harness constructively (things like gamma and X-rays) and as a result we have to do some weird physics stuff to convert them. PVN batteries convert particle radiation, beta radiation from tritium decay specifically, into usable photons via a thin coating of phosphorus on the glass, instead of them being captured directly.

    (this is a wild oversimplification just to be clear)

    source
  • m3t00@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    watched something on nuclear waste. produces some heat just sitting there. should be usable energy there. think it emits neutrons and electrons. ‘ionizing’ radiation. don’t know if there is a way to generate electricity directly.

    source
  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    These types of energy generating current from radioactive decay exist and are used to power spacecraft for years. Not very efficient and the cost/benefit ratio is really only justified on space exploration budgets.

    Short answer to why aren’t we doing X is always, always, cost.

    source
• captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I would swear I saw Tom Scott interview one lab that was planning on building a fusion generator that worked like a diesel engine. Like, the fusion reaction drives a piston.

  source

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The pistons drive the fusion, or so they think… General Fusion.

    source

    • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I want it to work like a hit and miss engine. Big ol flywheel, the exhaust valve is held open until the RPM dips low enough then you get a power stroke, just a nice controlled fusion event that releases a whackton of energy, bring the RPM up a bit…

      source

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Like the TARDIS Time Rotor, just a pleasant up and down stroking motion as Billie Piper trips and falls onto you…

        source
• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Just get Maxwell’s demon to separate the plasma into positive and negative charges, effectively creating a capacitor, then discharge it directly over some HVDC lines!

  source