everyone will have to 'fess up to using it eventually as AI will become "involved in nearly all future production.
True enough! No reason not to say it up front, right?
Look y’all, not 1-in-20 people give a flying fuck about AI like we do on here.
everyone will have to 'fess up to using it eventually as AI will become "involved in nearly all future production.
True enough! No reason not to say it up front, right?
Look y’all, not 1-in-20 people give a flying fuck about AI like we do on here.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That is true, but for instance Ian M Banks predicted AI being able to make art already back in the 70’s in his Culture series of books.
Even accurately simulating famous artists. And his conclusion was that AI should not make art at all, because it would end up detracting from the value of art.
I think the reason the CEO is wrong, is that it will be a legal shitshow, and I think AI art may become illegal, or at the very least required to be clearly labeled as AI art.
We will see how it turns out.
mika_mika@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’ll call your bet and say that Sweeny is right. I think AI will become so commonplace that there will be no way around it and the market has already been streamlined in this direction.
I would love it if my “feels” could be seen. But that is not reality. This battle is already long lost. Lemmy and the like can rage about it til their flames die out but it is a lost cause.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 week ago
There have already been several lawsuits against AI companies, where it is revealed that AI art is copied from existing original works.
You may be right, but I don’t think that battle is lost quite yet.
AI is mostly good for memes, beyond that it tends to quickly becomes repetitive, and of little value.
Of course AI art generally has a human “director” guiding the AI on what to do. We will see how it turns out.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
The result is that this is unsustainable unless copyright and IP law except for trademark and authorship are dropped, to avoid imbalance between using AI on existing work to generate commercially clean substance and using your ability, helped by existing culturally meaningful material.
It’s basically an IP laundering technology. Supply to satisfy demand.
When libertarians say that regulations make barriers for those more vulnerable, but not for those who can bend those barriers, they are right. Except I doubt many a libertarian expected to be proven right this way 20 years ago.
And I think they might even drop IP laws. When enough elite types are certain that control of computing power and datasets allow them to remain on top in such an environment.
That’s also where all the advice to get used to AI in all production comes from, I think, they are already salivating at the thought of just reusing old stuff from enormous datasets, legally, not paying anything, and keeping staff only to do basic control of what the machine generates. Basically people who expect that they’ll be able to do the theft of the century and remain elite.
The headlines about AI killing human creativity don’t help, they are telling these people what they want to hear.
It won’t kill all human creativity. It will kill those relying upon killing it. It’s like a gold mine in EU4, except giving inflation 10x the original.
I’ve just read yesterday what the Russian idiom “red price” means (said about the biggest price one can give for something, and already a robbery). So - the opposite of that was “white price”. No, it’s not about civil war. It’s about copper and silver money. There were not that many silver mines in Russia, so when someone decided to turn the printer on, they’d mint a lot of copper coins. While silver money was mostly foreign (“yefimok”, from Joachimstaler, same as taler, dollar, you get the etymology, the international coin of that age, which is also why metropolies had their traditional money and colonies had dollars - dollar meant a silver coin of the same weight as Joachimstaler).
Since I’ve remembered Russian history, that’s also similar to USSR’s advertised strong side - instead of relying upon complex evolution process to achieve big things, we’ll just build a command system in charge of all our resources and plan the path we already know. As you might see, it doesn’t answer where future evolution will come from. It didn’t come at all.