Comment on Another WSJ banger about why the poors aren't doing more

• Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why would I seek out a most likely paywalled article from a media company I fucking hate to give them clicks and read about how I’m a piece of shit for not having a better 401k?

  source

  • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Again, I wasn’t aware that this was your first time on the internet. It’s in this thread multiple times. archive.ph/oM5UV

    source

    • dellish@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Mate you could have just provided the link the first time. There’s no need to be a dick about it. Someone didn’t see the li K elsewhere in the thread, is a little copy-paste really going to ruin your day? If you’re not going to be polite or helpful, try just not saying anything at all. We don’t need this sort of reddit-toxicity over here; no one appreciates it and no one will think better of you because of it.

      source
    • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Again, why would I give clicks to a media company I fucking hate to tell me that I’m a piece of shit? Searching through the thread is still seeking it out.

      source

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        That’s how the archive works, dude. You aren’t giving them clicks at all. The article says the exact opposite. Here you sit, angry and misinformed and all you had to do was exercise your brain just a tiny little bit. You are the midwit that reddit breeds, lil guy.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Perhaps because you were curious to find if a thing is true or not?

    Perhaps because you wonder if the headline matches the content? (and in this case, it does not)

    Do you ingest and internalize any clickbait headline that matches your view of the world?

    source