Comment on [deleted]

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• s@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Wait, who said anything about genitals? I thought she had an aubergine

  source

  • Valmond@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Aah, a vegan?

    source
• salacious_coaster@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • JoMiran@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    As long as you respect others’ gender and sexuality, you are under no obligation to feel sexually attracted to them the same way they aren’t obligated to feel sexually attracted to you. Love and respect for all is the bottom line.

    source
  • SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Whoa whoa buddy, nobody is shitting on you for your preferences.

    1. The original post by this woman stating “how many drinks would it take for you to forget I have a dick” is part of the problem because it normalizes the idea of a beautiful woman having a dick as a fetish instead of just “some beautiful women have dicks.”

    2. When someone says “who cares” they aren’t necessarily saying there is anything wrong with a different opinion. In my case, it was meant as an implication that the original question itself is problematic to begin with.

    3. I didn’t feel attacked when @IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world suggested that “you are the bottom, ya lucky bastard” despite the fact that I am strictly a top when it comes to trans women… because they weren’t implying that was something wrong with feeling differently and I upvoted them because it was funny.

    4. A lot of those women (who aren’t busy using fetishization of their dicks as a business model) don’t actually like having a dick and want to get a full bottom transition surgery but cannot afford it and/or are prevented from pursuing it due to how fucked American healthcare and the issue of being trans is treated at all. Even if you don’t like the bits they have now, there may be a future where they no longer have those bits, and in the meantime there’s two other holes they might be happy to have you sexually active in. In my experience, a lot of transwomen who still have their original equipment don’t want it touched at all because it’s a reminder of their gender dysphoria/dysmorphia.

    Anyway, wasn’t meant to say that you can’t have your preferences.

    source

    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      speak for yourself I will defecate on that guy’s preferences.

      source
  • sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You took the bait. They know that pretty much everybody cares about that.

    source
• starblursd@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Based

  source
• IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  that isn’t the bottom line.

  you are the bottom

  ya lucky bastard

  source

  • kelpie_returns@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Unlikely given how estrogen effects the body, but lol no less

    source

    • ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Use it or lose it. My partner and I are 5 and 3 years on E respectively and both have no issue with that particular function.

      source

      • kelpie_returns@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Happy for yall lol

        source
    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      being top/bottom has fuckall to do with hormones.

      source
    • Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Estrogen doesn’t make someone a bottom. A lot of transfems are bottoms, but not because of estrogen.

      source

      • kelpie_returns@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I wasn’t trying to say that estrogen makes you a bottom, so much as I was commenting on its effects on the genitalia and general sexual ideation, which both vary case to case ofc. Generally tho, and this is almost all from friends who are/were on the stuff so its secondhand at best, it seems like topping in the conventional sense tends to become a lot less appealing or even just fully a non-option for some.

        source
• sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  who cares what set of genitals she’s got?

  thatsbait.gif

  source