s
@s@piefed.world
- Comment on I'm so goddamn sick of this fat, orange, narcissistic asshole and I will celebrate when he dies 10 hours ago:
I think Heathcliff should be his successor. His superior comics have lived in the fat cat’s shadow for far too long.
- Comment on I'm so goddamn sick of this fat, orange, narcissistic asshole and I will celebrate when he dies 10 hours ago:
Yeah of course. This post is about Garfield
- Comment on I'm so goddamn sick of this fat, orange, narcissistic asshole and I will celebrate when he dies 10 hours ago:
The last bottle should be for Nermal, that little annoying punk
- Comment on I'm so goddamn sick of this fat, orange, narcissistic asshole and I will celebrate when he dies 11 hours ago:
Dude I’m talking about a cartoon cat, I got no idea what you’re talking about
- Comment on I'm so goddamn sick of this fat, orange, narcissistic asshole and I will celebrate when he dies 11 hours ago:
#ReleaseTheArleneFiles
- Submitted 11 hours ago to [deleted] | 50 comments
- Comment on Or two generations... 16 hours ago:
And a hinga dinga durgen to you too
- Comment on I ate: Arby's Steak Nuggets 1 day ago:
I tried the Arby’s hamburger and I thought I was going to die after
- Comment on Zombies!! 1 day ago:
Interesting. Does their Facebook page often post infographics made by others and apply their watermark on top regardless?
- Comment on Mickey17 on his predecessors. 2 days ago:
OP’s post is a veiled reference to another user on this community
- Comment on Mickey17 on his predecessors. 2 days ago:
There’s only so much cringe and hornyposting on non-horny communities a person can do before you gotta block them
- Comment on ChatGPT Atlas can automate Lemmy shitposting 3 days ago:
Devs and admins, take this post as a herald warning of what is to come
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
Wait, who said anything about genitals? I thought she had an aubergine
- Comment on Zombies!! 4 days ago:
Thanks. I think that it’s important to be judicious when calling something AI generated because too many false positives will delegitimize true claims and further blur the lines of real and unreal content.
- Comment on xkcd #3157: Emperor Palpatine 4 days ago:
I can’t find a film date, but McDiarmid was filmed for the special edition of Empire Strikes Back as the hologram of Palpatine. If you want to be exhaustive, the actor (voice acting or otherwise) also has canon appearances as the character in Rebels, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Tales of the Jedi, and The Bad Batch.
- Comment on girl 4 days ago:
- Comment on Zombies!! 5 days ago:
Looks like Dennis without makeup
- Comment on Zombies!! 5 days ago:
The art did seem off to me, but it fits the style of some textbook diagrams. The number placement doesn’t seem like an error that an AI would make. I was unable to find any results in reverse image searches that were more than a few days old, so given the infamous piss filter on the image, I think the man and dog are AI generated but the text is lazily human placed (I cannot attest to the validity of the scientific claims but it also seems human written to me).
In my research, I looked up the Medinaz watermark on the image. This educational publisher claims that their diagrams are “hand-drawn” and I was unable to find any other images published by them that match this art style, and all of their pages do not match the visual design above. Their infographics also tend to be a bit more campy or silly. Most of their images, but not the text, also have a watermark for Medinaz (sometimes shortened to Naz). Here is an example that could stand on its own as a meme:
Further down the rabbit hole, I found a review accusing them of plagiarizing the text they published for First Aid. I also encountered a full pdf for their Cardiology book, which includes a page with a couple of copyrighted characters (The Queen of Hearts from Disney’s Alice in Wonderland, and Thomas the Tank Engine).
Does Medinaz’s track record for disregarding intellectual property indicate that they would be willing to substitute their human artists for AI generated images? Or could they have stolen the image from elsewhere and slapped their watermark on it and published it as their own? Or could a separate party have added Medinaz’s watermark onto an image that they didn’t publish to affront them somehow? If somebody can find a Medinaz book with this image in it, we may have an answer.
- Comment on 6 days ago:
That’s why everything online is determined by the AlGoreithm
- Comment on He'll let you do it if you're rich 1 week ago:
It is the judge from the movie version of Pink Floyd’s The Wall. Other parallels between the story and Trump are more obvious than that one.
- Comment on The shitiest of them all 1 week ago:
- Comment on He'll let you do it if you're rich 1 week ago:
- Comment on Then and Now 1 week ago:
I’ve not seen that, but should we just continue to let the far right steal and appropriate language, symbols, and icons? Why would the far right be opposed to that which their idols flaunt and openly utilize?
- Comment on Then and Now 1 week ago:
Imagine asking a clanker lover to produce an original thought
- Comment on Sent to drai-aai-aaain... 1 week ago:
Despite all my rage I am still just a porcelain squirrel in a vampire costume
- Comment on Found my people 1 week ago:
Nipples
- Comment on Do it anyways! F R E E D O M ! ! ! 2 weeks ago:
The woke mob is trying to censor the truth about Charlie Kirk washing his balls in the Burger King soda dispenser
- Comment on We interrupt your happiness to bring you this special message from our sponsors 2 weeks ago:
As a young adult man, seeing an ad for diapers designed for elderly women doesn’t entice me to buy them. I’m also not buying a new car after seeing every ad for a car. I know of Liberty Mutual by way of their advertisements but I’m not in the market for buying an emu so they won’t get my business.
- Comment on We interrupt your happiness to bring you this special message from our sponsors 2 weeks ago:
I think you have to go to the NSFW websites for that
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to [deleted] | 57 comments
