I believe this is also illegal in some US States. I know of at least a couple that don’t allow biometric data to be stored without concent; I think Facebook even lost a case in one state and had to pay a pretty large sum of money.
Naich@lemmings.world 3 weeks ago
This feels like it should be illegal in the EU.
SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It most certainly is. There’s no way they’re implementing this here.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 3 weeks ago
there’s no way
What. You gonna make em? Once the data’s on their servers, they’ll do what they want.
Unless you physically disallow and destroy their hardware that’s invaded your continent.
20cello@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Will it happen in Europe too?
oce@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
This cannot happen in EU with the current GDPR, they would need to request and receive consent prior to collecting the face.
lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 3 weeks ago
Google nest camera has been doing this for years already though?
oce@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
Is it sold in EU with the face collection?
stoy@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Swede here, our laws disallow private security cameras from filming public areas.
The law is so broad that it interfered with dashcams, disallowing them for years.
Dave@lemmy.nz 3 weeks ago
That’s really interesting. Is it specifically security cameras?
Can you generally take videos of people in public places? Photos?
stoy@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Normal cameras and video cameras are fine, the key point is that the camera should not be fixed for continuous monitoring of public spaces.
Dashcams were a grey area, most are fixed mounted to a car with the capability to continously record so at first only cameras you manually place and trigger when about to drive were permitted, then the law was loosened further, and now I believe they are permitted.
Now here we have an interesting fact about the Swedish court system, you can present any evidence regardless of if it was collected through legal or illegal means, and the court will decide on if they will accept it or not.
The illegal part only comes into play in a separate case where you have to stand trial for whatever illegal act you did.
Dave@lemmy.nz 3 weeks ago
I found this page explaining that it’s not that it’s illegal (necessarily, keep reading), but that there is a GDPR exemption for private property and if you’re filming areas the public access then you need to comply with GDPR. The page says for dashcams you need to comply with GDPR as well.
This page says it’s generally not allowed to record, but if you read the Swedish version is has a flow chart (that I can’t read 😅).
What most interests me is that it keeps referring to the GDPR as the reason why you can’t record public areas (or your neighbours). I’m not in Europe and don’t know much about the GDPR but why is Sweden special with these rules, why aren’t all countries in the European Union limiting the use of security cameras on public areas?
Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 weeks ago
That’s a good way to handle it.
jpeps@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I wish we had more protection in the UK. Technically the law allows filming public property as long as it is not the direct focus, eg you film your front door and catch some of the street. But it’s not policed at all. Living on a terraced main road I cant leave my house without being filmed by at least 5 different neighbour’s cameras from a range of different American or Chinese companies. One camera literally just points towards a window of my own home. It’s insane, I feel like they’re all just standing outside watching me.
Technically, I have the right to ask to see the footage they record and ask for adjustments to angles etc, but it’s left to individuals to do. I’d have to have an awkward individual conversation with a bunch of strangers (sad but true) about something I doubt they even consider an issue.
I’d love to see some legislation that would require some publically accessible way to review what’s in camera for doorbell cams, but I guess that would just be seen as helping criminals.
boovard@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Same in Belgium, and Tesla is even having issues with it’s “sentinel” feature being ruled illegal 🙏
JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
It is more specific in France, but I actually dug around regulations a year ago when the other homeowners in my building wanted to install a security camera. The common parts of a residential building are considered somewhere in between public and private.
The short version is you need majority approval, the tape can only be accessed if something happens, you can’t film apartments doors or windows and as few people as possible may have access. Which put quite a damper on my neighbours who were already celebrating how they would watch who enters and leaves the building at all times.
Bunch of fucking weirdos.
RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Same in Italy, minus the dashcam part
Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
do public seccurity cameras exist though? In the US, we have cameras watching the movement of cars thru the road network via license plate. It’s dystopian
stoy@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Yes they do exist, the areas are clearly signed when the cameras are used for surveilence, we also have traffic monitoring cameras to get info of how the traffic flows, they are publicly viewable and fairly low resolution so you can see the traffic flow but can’t really identify a specific license plate.
There are cameras that do do that though, they are put up to automatically bill you for the congestion charge.