Clean version.
Comment on beans š«
Sunspear@piefed.social āØ11ā© āØhoursā© ago
Iām sorry, but cum.
You can swear on the internet. And this isnāt swearing even, itās just related to sex, you know, something natural
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
Tyfys šš«”
ook@discuss.tchncs.de āØ4ā© āØhoursā© ago
Typhus? How rude to wish a disease on this poor person!
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org āØ11ā© āØhoursā© ago
Iām sorry, but cum.
This is what I say when Iām about to finish too soon.
snooggums@piefed.world āØ10ā© āØhoursā© ago
butt cum
BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca āØ7ā© āØhoursā© ago
It wasn't a censor, OP just got a little too excited
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
Iām with you. Censorship is killing my sanity. But hereās the issue.
We already have content restrictions in place to āprotectā under 18s whether theyāre mature enough or not to see porn or gore. Physical and digital media have PEGI, BBFC, etc. ISPs have parental control - the UK has Content Lock. We have parents with personal preferences for their offspringās access.
National or global censorship is useless. In their quest for power the corporations and governments are trying to turn the internet into a child-friendly internet. If these are the lengths theyāre willing to go to, if their intentions were honest, it would surely be easier to let the adults have the freedom of adults and build a second internet for children. Maybe age lock that. Instead of killing everything consenting adults made.
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org āØ2ā© āØhoursā© ago
Just imagine the change that could go through social media platforms if, instead of censoring their content, users would just share links to platforms which allow them to freely share without unnecessary censorship.
On the other hand Iām a bit scared of what the rich assholes would come up with instead if they canāt work themselves off at the enshitification of reddit et alā¦
starman2112@sh.itjust.works āØ3ā© āØhoursā© ago
cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ9ā© āØhoursā© ago
these days itās not because people are trying to censor the content from the viewer, but theyāre censoring from the algorithms. they want their content to be seen, and algorithms will demote content when it has profanity. probably not the case on lemmy, but this was a screenshot from somewhere
__nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
Some platforms do not allow swears and ocr can easily read text from images. It feels like a form of censorship but actually enables the original poster to circumvent censorship.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
heh butt
Hupf@feddit.org āØ48ā© āØminutesā© ago
Image