Comment on beans 🫘

Sunspear@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• wesker@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’m sorry, but cum.

  This is what I say when I’m about to finish too soon.

  source

  • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    butt cum

    source
• Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Clean version.

  Image

  source

  • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Tyfys 🙏🫡

    source

    • ook@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Typhus? How rude to wish a disease on this poor person!

      source
• BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It wasn't a censor, OP just got a little too excited

  source
• Hupf@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    🤢🤮🤢

    source
• Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’m with you. Censorship is killing my sanity. But here’s the issue.

  We already have content restrictions in place to “protect” under 18s whether they’re mature enough or not to see porn or gore. Physical and digital media have PEGI, BBFC, etc. ISPs have parental control - the UK has Content Lock. We have parents with personal preferences for their offspring’s access.

  National or global censorship is useless. In their quest for power the corporations and governments are trying to turn the internet into a child-friendly internet. If these are the lengths they’re willing to go to, if their intentions were honest, it would surely be easier to let the adults have the freedom of adults and build a second internet for children. Maybe age lock that. Instead of killing everything consenting adults made.

  source

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    There are already multiple search engines only for children. It’s only excuses to seize power over people.

    source
  • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Just imagine the change that could go through social media platforms if, instead of censoring their content, users would just share links to platforms which allow them to freely share without unnecessary censorship.

    On the other hand I’m a bit scared of what the rich assholes would come up with instead if they can’t work themselves off at the enshitification of reddit et al…

    source
• cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  these days it’s not because people are trying to censor the content from the viewer, but they’re censoring from the algorithms. they want their content to be seen, and algorithms will demote content when it has profanity. probably not the case on lemmy, but this was a screenshot from somewhere

  source

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This is also why you‘ll see/hear the verb „unalive“ and have people refer to „seggs“.

    source
• HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  heh butt

  source
• starman2112@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  CUM!

  source
• __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Some platforms do not allow swears and ocr can easily read text from images. It feels like a form of censorship but actually enables the original poster to circumvent censorship.

  source