You’re better off with 120hz if you like reading things on your phone at all.
Comment on YSK: You should enable peak refresh rate in Android
mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 day ago
Depends on your device and a bunch of other factors. If you are trying to maximize battery life you are generally better sticking to 60.
If you are consuming 120fps content or doing some kind of mobile gaming that actually supports it, you may benefit from 120.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I haven’t daily driven a phone but I really like the idea of the screens that can go below 60hz. Such as if you are reading a static webpage or an ebook.
QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I messed around with the “display refresh rate” setting and it seems like it’s 120 when there’s any sort of animation or you touch the screen at all, but it goes to 60 if it’s just playing a video or you’re not touching it, and 30 for the “always on” display that shows the clock.
I expected it to be more like the SteamDeck which just goes 1fps if nothing is happening on the home menu and jumps up to 60 or 90 (depending on model and settings) when anything moves
pretty interesting!
Nikls94@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I have to give credit to Apple for the variable motion, ranging from 1 fps to 120 fps. Sadly, the 1fps is only ever used on the lock screen. So much wasted potential.
jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 hours ago
You’re talking about different things. SteamDeck doesn’t set your display refresh frequency to 1hz. It’s just rendering frames at 1hz.
warmaster@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Or if competitive gaming has ruined you, why not let it ruin you battery life too?
moonlight@fedia.io 1 day ago
Basic scrolling feels so much better. And I don't think it really makes a huge difference for battery life, so I always leave if at 120.
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 hours ago
If you’re not used to 120 Hz then with 60 Hz you don’t feel like you’re missing out