Comment on Elon musk is a pedophile
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 17 hours ago
I honestly don’t think all people in the Epstein file are pedophile, even if they went to his island, even if they went multiple times, anymore than all the people in Charlie Manson’s diary were loonies and serial killers. It does cast doubts on what they did or did not know, but it’s not proof of wrongdoing in and of itself.
What being mentioned in the Epstein file really means is that those are utterly disgusting people who are part of a disgusting elite. The friends they keep say a lot about them, and what it says isn’t good.
I do believe Trump is a pedophile however, even if he was only mentioned twice in the Epstein files - in the birthday card and in Epstein rolodex - because both clearly show that Epstein and him have something a lot more special, dark and unavvowable in common that just partying together.
So no, absent more proof, I’ll assume Musk is “only” an obscenely wealthy, dangerous neo-Nazi with a ketamine addiction and a pedo daddy, but not a pedo himself. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the proof was presented soon…
There’s also the other illegal activities like money and financial fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, etc. This was huge with Epstein, and everybody’s focused on pedo stuff. They might think if they can disprove the pedo stuff then everything will go away.
Who knows though. It could be all of the above, and much more. Working with Russia illegally in some way? There could be treason there in some way involving the president of the US. Wouldnt be surprised if Musk too, and others.
Trump admitted to being sexually attracted to his own daughter when she was 13. Why was he not strung up for that?
I imagine that Epstein catered to lots of people’s fantasies. Trump is totally a pedo. But as much as I despise Muskito, I really don’t get that vibe from him. Young maybe … like late teens, early 20s… disgusting, creepy, … sure, but I just don’t get the pedo thing. This is just my opinion.
But here’s the thing, if he was there on that island and had reasonable suspicion that these girls were underage and knew what was going on and still did nothing. He’s just as guilty.
I think both of them are into young but post pubescent. From what little I’ve seen, both seem inclined to just pretend a little kid doesn’t even exist, but if they are like 14…
I’ve zero doubt that neither cares about age of consent, they have had a life of the world telling them they are special and whatever they want is right.
It’s interesting how there are always lots of people scrambling to protect the wealthy. Like he’s a nazi rapists, but let’s not call him a pedo come on people we need some dignity here.
I mean in essence you are correct, but were are people like you when ordinary people needs defense, or minorities? Maybe you’re there too but then you’re not like the most of them. Or so I feel.
I’m only applying to Musk or Trump the standards I would like others to apply to me. If I was wrongly accused of being a pedo, however vile an individual I might otherwise be, I would like others to have the intellectual honesty to say they have no proof, even if they hate my guts.
Also, it reflects poorly on people who accuse others of things without proof. It certainly would feel good to go around saying Musk is a pedo because the man is so abhorrent. But it would also be wrong.
A billionaire nazi, rapist, murderer, should have the same treatment as we get, or should we also get the correct treatment because it doesn’t seem we are.
I’m with you philosophically speaking, everyone should be innocent until proven guilty. And then we should all face the law similarly.
The rich aren’t facing the law, you’re just protecting his online persona/reputation IMO. That’s the point I try to make.
The rich aren’t facing the law
The point I’m trying to make, as a regular Joe who isn’t mega-rich on the backs of everybody else, is that we’re better than that.
you’ve got it wrong, I was always guilty till I proved my innocence, usually have to do the courts from jail
They aren’t scrambling to protect the wealthy, they’re holding those they agree with accountable to the truth. Calling every Nazi rapist murderer a pedophile just for the sake of it weakens the definition of the word, and gives ammunition to those actually scrambling to defend these fools when they catch you accusing people of heinous crimes without proof.
but were are people like you when ordinary people needs defense, or minorities?
When are ordinary people also Nazi rapist murderers that are being baselessly accused of pedophilia? Odd parallel to draw.
Let’s put it this way, when are those poor billionaires hold accountable to the law? Accusations means nothing to them.
You’re drawing nonsense conclusions.
People like to “protect” basic logic. This time it just happens to relate to someone rich. The person pointing out the basic logical flaws is certainly just as happy to do it in other situations.
Your assumption that it has anything to do with the wealth of the subject matter is your own bias at work.
I don’t think Prince Andrew is a paedophile. The girl was of legal age. I don’t even know if he knew she was trafficked
realitista@lemmus.org 16 hours ago
Well that and the fact that he was explicitly named by one of the victims as someone who had raped her when she was a child.