Comment on Google's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for users
Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 2 days ago“installing” as in “installing software”
Comment on Google's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for users
Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 2 days ago“installing” as in “installing software”
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
Okay but it’s specifically software from outside the Play Store?
grue@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The point is, there shouldn’t be a distinction. To make one is to support prejudice against installing software from elsewhere.
If you use “installing” for stuff from the Google store but any other word for stuff from other sources, you are aiding and abetting Google’s anti-property-rights propaganda.
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
There has to be. When 99% of installs come from one location, there needs to be a way to describe that other than “Installing apps from outside the default app store”.
No? It isn’t.
Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
The majority of PC game sales happen via steam but we don’t call games purchased from GOG “sideloaded.”
There is no necessary reason to make the distinction
choochooMF@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Y tho. What difference does it make? Its the same thing.
yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
The words for distinguishing between apps that come from one trusted location vs others is usually untrusted or unverified apps versus trusted or verified ones. “Installing apps from outside the default app store” converts to, “Installing an untrusted app”.
It’s not that complicated.
BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
The same word that I use to when I get software that’s not on the Microsoft Store, the Mac App Store, or whatever distro’s Software GUI when I am using my desktop…
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
If the MS Store and Mac App store made up 99% of installs, that might make sense.
ideonek@piefed.social 2 days ago
Why? That's a perfect example. There is no qualitative difrence between Microsoft Store and Play Store. Why quantitative difference in the market share would make any distinction in the terminology we use around the process?
BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
So when I install an app from Fdroid, it’s only “installing” if lots of other people do it? But if other people don’t use it as much it’s “sideloading”?
jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
When you install a ‘.exe’ file in Windows, you don’t call it ‘sideloading’, you call it ‘downloading and installing’.
This is the exact same thing. I download from sites, F-Droid, Obtainium, etc., and install the software that is the file I downloaded. I’m effectively NOT side-anything.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
You might call it that if 99% of software was installed from MS store.
DrDystopia@lemy.lol 1 day ago
0% of my android software is installed through Google Play. Then what?
Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
When I install software from the Arch User Repository I still just call it installing, even though it isn’t through the standard path. Everywhere else, you don’t make the distinction. For some reason on phones we’ve come to call it sideloading, even though the software is just software —it doesn’t care where it came from.
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
Because 99% of people are getting it from the same place…
yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
even within android, if you attempt to install an apk directly, it doesn’t say “would you like to sideload this application?”, but instead says, “Do you want to install this app?”.
Even Google’s own OS doesn’t use made up language.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Again, when I install something from the AUR (which is not where most software comes from) it isn’t given a special term. It’s the exact same situation as “sideloading” but we just call it installing. Can you explain what the difference is between them?
EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
The issue people have with making the distinction is that Google is trying to spin the narrative and make side loading seem like a dangerous and bad thing to the average user base who don’t know any better.
They’re taking umbrage with you agreeing that quantitative usage of a storefront makes something simply installing vs side loading a program. Because it helps Google’s narrative in a way.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
I understand exactly what people think the issue is. I don’t understand or agree with any of the logic. Google did not invent the term. Apple did not invent the term. There’s nothing in the term itself to imply anything nefarious. It’s nothing but a word used to describe apps installed from outside the default store. When 99-100% of users are all installing exclusively from the default store, it makes sense to have a term that describes that.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Installing software without a store was just called installing software.
Sideloading is when you download from the side, e.g. downloading software from a separate device instead of from the internet or physical media.
EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Google is twisting the word to justify their purpose of preventing people from installing anything that isn’t from their walled garden. So anything that sounds even close to support for that motive is going to be met with pushback, even if it is a word that existed before Google’s use of it. Google’s implicitly saying that installing something from anywhere other than their store is something nefarious or otherwise bad/risky. Google is trying to perform the same kind of security theatre as the US with the NSA at airports.
Honestly, it doesn’t matter to me where you install an app from because you’re simply installing it. Whether that’s from Google’s storefront, Apple’s, or somewhere else, you’re installing an app. The circumstances where I’d need a term to specifically say that I’m installing an app from outside the default app store would also be covered by simply saying “I got it from GitHub (or wherever).” It takes the same energy to answer the question of where you got it from regardless of whether you say that you installed it or you side loaded it.
track_stick_baboon@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Installing software from outside the play store should be called installing software. It’s installing software from the play store what should have a special name, like “gatedloading” for example.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
Good news. It is!
Make it hap’n Cap’n. You’re still not invalidating the term of “sideloading”.
Grazed@lemmy.world 1 day ago
In what way is installing from the play store fundamentally different? Just because it was preloaded on your phone? What if F droid was preloaded on your phone instead? Is it still sideloading? Google’s logic breaks down pretty quickly when you think about it
Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
If you need to be that specific, “installing” as in “installing software from outside the play store”
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
We have words for things for a reason.
Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Yet we call people who hold a doctorate “doctors”, and if we need to specify we use terms like “medical doctors” or “doctors in philosophy”.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Doctor can mean different things to different people.
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Ulrich@feddit.org 2 days ago
Yes, so what do you call it when referring specifically to those apps?