Engagement bait for other platforms that are engagement algorithm driven fishing for this exact kind of comment.
Comment on Malicious compliance
killingspark@feddit.org 1 week ago
Why the fuck would you censor “panicked”?
blackbelt352@lemmy.world 1 week ago
killingspark@feddit.org 1 week ago
i_guess_meme.png
blackbelt352@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Well that one mark ended up making 13 of the comments in just this comment chain alone. 14 including this one I’m making, on a post with 50 comments on it, over 20% of them. If this were any other massive platform like reddit or Instagram or Facebook, this level of engagement would drive algorithms extremely effectively.
CMDR_Horn@piefed.world 1 week ago
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Looks more like a stray markup made while editing.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 week ago
Oh, I thought it read panfucked. Whatever that means.
joyjoy@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
It’s like yelling “fire” in a crowded theater. Say “panic” on social media and suddenly everyone starts looting.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Welcome to corpo controlled internet, where you write within their guidelines, not where you freely communicate like actual people.
StrixUralensis@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 week ago
I believe that the persone who made the meme is just stupid
killingspark@feddit.org 1 week ago
I mean even in corpo internet lingo where obscenity is censored… Panicked? Is panicked now negative enough of a word to deserve censorship? It’s a crazy web out there
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Lowest common denominator strikes again with ludicrously unnecessary censorship. Not even curse words or things like “suicide” anymore, just whatever drifts past their sights.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 6 days ago
Its probably to avoid semantic analysis marking it as distressing or negative and deranking it for the target audience.
0x0@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
It probably triggered someone, somewhere, somehow, sometime and someone flagged it as an issue.