Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

• snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Under what law?

  [Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)

  source

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

    I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

    source

    • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      you will have to directly regulate image generation

      Its already being done to help prevent fake CSAM.

      That should have been standard from the start.

      source
    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I don’t think anyone has any delusions that Twitter is private, not even DM’s.

      source

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It absolutely is private insofar as it is a channel between the software running on their end -> user who is operating the software. The lack of end to end encryption does not make it not private it makes it insecure which doesn’t speak whatsoever to the issue raised which is that creation of an image by a user isn’t likely to be considered publication until they share it.

        It’s highly probable that keeping people from generating deep fake nudes requires additional law.

        source
  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?

    source

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Definitely not convicted. That’d be some crazy speed.

      However, your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane. There has to be a first case in which it hadn’t happened before.

      source

      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        However, your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane

        It would be insane if that was what I had insisted, but that didn’t happen.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.

    source
• SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

  Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

  But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement

  source